[werdwerdus]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alleyman /img/forum/go_quote.gif Foobar. Even the default/Columns UI look is fine if you're more of a listener than a customization geek.

QFT. Remember it's about the music...

 

[Polaris111688]

Foobar. It's served me so well the last couple of years.

 

[Ingo]

Go WinAmp+ASIO!

Foobar2k is great, but I don't care about customization and I don't ever have my music player covering a large portion of my screen. The WinAmp skin MMD3 has the best winshade mode there is. It doesn't interfere with anything else I might be doing on my computer while I'm listening to music. Also I can have a small pane to display album art in the bottom right hand corner of my screen.

 

[velogreg]

.... and what about burning to CD? I have tried Nero and found it to be a pain, I keep crashing off my Nero 7 essentials. Any good quality conversion/burn program recommendations?

 

[jilgiljongiljing]

this has to be the most unanimous recommendation ever on Headfi.

Yet another Foobar victory!

 

[tufflitestudios]

Foobar it is! Thanks for the info...

 

[wakdady]

mediamonkey is better for maintaining a large library and it supports flac

 

[Ingo]

Quote:

Originally Posted by wakdady /img/forum/go_quote.gif mediamonkey is better for maintaining a large library and it supports flac

I don't agree. You can set up Foobar2k to function as well as Mediamonkey's library. Almost everyone here with large libraries (5000+ tracks) uses Foobar2k.

 

[SilverPilot]

foobar2000

I still like the 0.8.3 version.

 

[bonjonno]

after using foobar 2K 0.8.3 for two years I switched to XMPlay and am much happier. Still use FB2K to rip flac files tho.

 

[RasmusseN]

I use foobar2k

by default it's pretty crummy but it can be highly customizable.