Prodigy D2A-HPA USB DAC/headphone amp- a review of sorts
Mar 31, 2015 at 6:04 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 7

adiebear

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Posts
27
Likes
10
Prodigy D2A-HPA USB DAC/headphone amp
A few things first. I’m no reviewer, no headphone junkie (though my experience with this product may change the headphone part).
How did I come by the Prodigy and what vested interest do I have?
I thought my Audioquest Dragonfly v1 was faulty (an uninstall and install sorted it out) so hopped on eBay and came across the Prodigy for $49.99- new. I came up short when asking on
Head- Fi and 
Googling info so contacted the seller. Long story short , the designer never took it to market and moved on, so the seller offered me my money back if I wasn’t happy- and if I was I would say some nice things.
I am happy, so here goes.
If you judge a book by its cover you would buy it for that alone. It’s hard to reconcile the price of the Prodigy D2A-HPA with the quality of the packaging. Really well packaged and presented. That bang for buck factor increased out of sight when I heard it though- gushing to follow.
The tail and the unit itself fit very snugly and securely in my laptop compared with my Dragonfly. The drivers installed automatically and quickly. I swapped between the Prodigy and the Dragonfly, playing the same songs through JRiver Media Centre 20 and my ACS T15 iems.
At 1st bite the Dragonfly seemed more impressive. It has more bass heft and more impact but- and it’s a huge but- it quickly became apparent that the bass is lumpy, the treble grainy, the soundstage denser compared with the Prodigy. In fact it sounded very artificial by comparison.
Initially I thought the Prodigy a little thin and lacking in bass- a little treble- happy. I soon realised that the sound was just more natural. The trebles were less sibilant and smoother, more open and without grain. The bass was in fact there, just not exaggerated. It actually extended deeper and further, as did the wide soundstage. The music flowed more naturally, was more immersive, with better placement of instruments and decays that were just not there with the Dragonfly. The Prodigy dug out more detail, had significantly more clarity and the Dragonfly sounded veiled by comparison.
I am definitely treble shy and the treble on the Prodigy can clear wax the Dragonfly can’t. Reviews of the Dragonfly have mentioned the lack of good treble so, for most, the treble of the Prodigy may be a good thing. I must add that I EQ the treble pretty much the same for both, but that may be to do with the ACSs. I disabled the Headphone function in the JRiver DSP studio with the Prodigy. I used it with the Dragonfly to combat fatigue, but it was detrimental with the Prodigy. I had previously found the iems fatiguing. Now I can listen for hours.
I started with notes of music I listened to- how X’s piano sounded wonderful, how fluid the music was etc etc. but won’t bore you to sleep with ALL the details.
I accidentally listened to some Mp3 tracks and even a dire 128kb Shania Twain song sounded ok. Triad from 4 Way Street at 320kps sounded better than I’ve heard mp3 before.
FLAC was great, which brings me to the Prodigy’s features.
 
You can find it here:
 http://www.ebay.com/itm/PRODIGY-USB-DIGITAL-TO-ANALOG-INTERFACE-HEADPHONE-AMP-DAC-DRAGONFLY/251897686824?_trksid=p2047675.c100011.m1850&_trkparms=aid%3D222007%26algo%3DSIC.MBE%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D20140602152332%26meid%3Df38583aaffa9443e9e788765c86bb144%26pid%3D100011%26rk%3D1%26rkt%3D1%26sd%3D251839088955
 
There you will see that it can play 24/192 files and has all manner of bells and whistles crammed into its casing, which is pretty tough. I twice dropped it on concrete. No blemishes.
The Prodigy has a gain switch for harder to drive headphones. It also has 2 outputs- one to an external DAC.
I also listened on my hi-fi system using Monster cable into a Quicksilver Audio valve preamp (on loan) feeding Hypex module monoblocks and Eminent Technology LFT 16 speakers with a B&W ASW700 sub. I also (with careful use of the laptop’s volume) plugged directly into the sub with signal from the sub to the monoblocks.
The result influenced my buying decisions. I was looking for a middling DAC/pre but instead sold my existing TacT unit and the Dragonfly and bought an upmarket Modwright LS100 preamp, content to use just the Prodigy as a DAC until my wallet recovers.
Remember- its $49.99!
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 
Apr 8, 2015 at 3:48 AM Post #2 of 7
Here is a link; http://www.prodigyelectronics.net/digital-to-analog-converters.html
 
I had this response from the seller: It is my understanding that the Prodigy uses a ATI 48/24 Codec and it is compatible with playback for virtually all file formats up to 192/24 bit files. The ATI codec is made by a sister company of TI and is a very high grade part. All supporting circuitry in the unit is supported by mil spec (plus, minus, 0.01% tolerance) Vishay resistors, and Solen Capacitors. The drive amp is a AD 7240 which is also a mil spec op-amp part.
 
Apr 8, 2015 at 4:43 PM Post #3 of 7

Update: Listening with Onkyo ES-FC300 headphones which I thought I’d give a go- totally different than with the ACS T15 iems. No treble issues - a slight bump up at 6khz and I EQ’d the bass down 3.1 dbs.
 
Apr 23, 2020 at 9:22 PM Post #4 of 7
These are on eBay again and I grabbed one. I will write a review soon. Considering the non silent background even at low gain It is superior to iFi nano BL and zishan z3 as dac/headphones amp and in quality is probably nearest to fiio e10k but with iFi BL tuning. I did open mine but the board is covered in black dip so the components can't be identified. Unfortunate because I was so excited to see if it was really ATI brand. It's just a single IC that does everything from usb to headphone out because there are only a handful of other analog components on board. My biggest complaint is non silent / black background. I would like to give this another shot with a USB isolator. It has very powerful bass and seems to have good clarity. But it is not any better than anything on the market for $100. For the asking price it is not bad. My other major complaint is even at low gain the volume range usable on any of my IEMs is 1-10. This could have been a trivially easy mod IF the board wasn't covered in black goop.
 
Last edited:
Apr 24, 2020 at 4:45 AM Post #6 of 7
I had no idea this was commercially available. I was told it never got to market and the designer moved on. I still use mine from time to time and did try it with an Audioquest Jitterbug but can't recall the outcome- it was to an amp and speakers. It's ok- still better than the original Dragonfly. I could not get it to play 192/24 but mine was a prototype. For $49 (eBay) it's pretty good value.
 
Apr 24, 2020 at 4:47 AM Post #7 of 7
I had no idea this was commercially available. I was told it never got to market and the designer moved on. I still use mine from time to time and did try it with an Audioquest Jitterbug but can't recall the outcome- it was to an amp and speakers. It's ok- still better than the original Dragonfly. I could not get it to play 192/24 but mine was a prototype. For $49 (eBay) it's pretty good value.

Completely agree with these two statements.
Pretty much worth it for the optical output anyway, not much else at this price range offers that.
Btw - i don't even have any 192 / 24 but i don't even think this supports 24 bit output. Its ASIO performance is nothing special and as one would imagine, ASIO4ALL only.

Not commercially available btw, just one guy on ebay who happens to have a lot of Prodigy branded stuff, must be the guy who has been sitting on all this stuff all this time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top