marvin
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
- Posts
- 2,580
- Likes
- 18
Quote:
An HD-VMD alike spec has already been beaten. It's pretty much identical to the initial studio supported HD-DVD spec which used DVD-9 discs and encoding advances to fit HD content onto them. Prices were estimated to be within $50 of current DVD player prices (more expensive decoders), the same disc stamping plants could be reused, and the only real cost change would be in mastering to HD standards rather than SD standards.
That spec is fairly close to the edge on size for high quality encodes which is why the blue laser diode standards won out. Lossless soundtracks featured on some Blu-Ray discs would have been nixed too. Not enough space.
Quote:
You're low balling the market size of the non-Chinese/Indian market. The US is 300M, the EU is 500M, Canada is 30M and Japan is 130M. Total market size is around 960M. China and India combined run 2.5B.
Still, total market size doesn't tell anything about profitability. The 960M of the Western + Japan market are high end consumers with low piracy rates. The 2.5B of India + China are low end consumers with ridiculous piracy rates. As far as profitability goes, Western + Japan wipes the floor with India + China.
Also, while the high definition market penetration in the Western + Japan market is still pretty low, the high definition market penetration the India + China market is nearly nonexistent. HD-VMD offers the India + China market higher player costs and higher mastering costs for an extra gain of resolution that a vanishingly small percentage of the population can use. Low cost wireless internet distribution will likely win out in these markets as it will allow for an income stream not tainted by rampant piracy.
Originally Posted by blessingx Only somewhat related - but I wonder if even the threat of a new HD VMD format [NYTimes] could play a part in lowering Blu-ray prices? Probably wishful thinking. Maybe a new format war could be fun. |
An HD-VMD alike spec has already been beaten. It's pretty much identical to the initial studio supported HD-DVD spec which used DVD-9 discs and encoding advances to fit HD content onto them. Prices were estimated to be within $50 of current DVD player prices (more expensive decoders), the same disc stamping plants could be reused, and the only real cost change would be in mastering to HD standards rather than SD standards.
That spec is fairly close to the edge on size for high quality encodes which is why the blue laser diode standards won out. Lossless soundtracks featured on some Blu-Ray discs would have been nixed too. Not enough space.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aevum /img/forum/go_quote.gif the thing is, that VMD has nothing for the studios, the DRM is too weak and they are a bit late in the game for studio support, but it might still stand a good chance in asia if the mastering costs are low and they can produce the players at a cheap cost, who gives a rats behind about the american and european market when you can dominate the indian and chinese market, 600 million people vs 2.1 billion, |
You're low balling the market size of the non-Chinese/Indian market. The US is 300M, the EU is 500M, Canada is 30M and Japan is 130M. Total market size is around 960M. China and India combined run 2.5B.
Still, total market size doesn't tell anything about profitability. The 960M of the Western + Japan market are high end consumers with low piracy rates. The 2.5B of India + China are low end consumers with ridiculous piracy rates. As far as profitability goes, Western + Japan wipes the floor with India + China.
Also, while the high definition market penetration in the Western + Japan market is still pretty low, the high definition market penetration the India + China market is nearly nonexistent. HD-VMD offers the India + China market higher player costs and higher mastering costs for an extra gain of resolution that a vanishingly small percentage of the population can use. Low cost wireless internet distribution will likely win out in these markets as it will allow for an income stream not tainted by rampant piracy.