Quote:
Originally Posted by fewtch
Buy both and listen.
|
I did just that. When I try to describe the sound of the Go-Vibe (which I have done to the point where folks must have become weary of it) I compare it to my PPA rather than to my cmoy, because the sonic portrait of the music it portrays is more similar to that of the PPA than to that of the cmoy.
I got my cmoy from a fellow Head-Fier with good feedback, and I am happy with it for what it is and sounds like. It provides a nice improvement to sound quality from a modest source for modest phones. In fact, a colleague at work is using it and enjoying it very much every day from a the headphone jack of a work-issue PC with a pair of iRiver silver earbuds.
My Go-Vibe, by way of comparisson, is the beating heart of a listening station that I set up at home for very discerning listeners who I don't want to share my main rig with (because they aren't all that careful with equipment). To their picky ears and mine, a Sony D-321 PCDP, MagWires Original IC, Go-Vibe with AD823, and AKG K240S provide a deep, satisfying hi-fi sound for everything from the harshest rock to the most refined classical. When I listen to this rig, it reminds me far more of listening to my main rig with PPA than it reminds me of listening using the cmoy (in the same secondary rig).
The sonic differences: the Go-Vibe is better at portraying
a) dynamic range - with a blacker background, the subtler sounds get a better representation - and enable them to coexist well with much louder voices - giving an effectively wider and more enjoyable dynamic range.
b) crystal clarity and immediacy of sound - the Go-Vibe is better able to provide the voltage & current needed by the phones without the safety net of a current buffer. This direct-from-the-opamp sound path gives a crystal clarity to the sound and downright visceral (well, from the ears down to the bottom of the chest viscera) textures to sounds throughout the acoustic spectrum, but strikingly noticeable (and enjoyable) in the bass.
c) richer acoustic spectral mix - this shows up as both a richer, fuller, more ear-satisfying sound to all music, AND (because a lot of the spatial information is in the upper end, where the wavelengths are short and spatial localization is greater) better sense of the overall space in which the musical voices co-exist and the placement of the voices within that space.
d) depth of sound and its translucency - the Go-Vibe gives a significantly deeper sound and its subjective quality is that the sound has a greater translucency than the cmoy - both of which my ears love.
But the real test is overall enjoyment and the awe-in-listening factor, which are consistently higher for me with the Go-Vibe than with the cmoy. Overall, the Go-Vibe gives a portrayal of the sound that is very similar to, but at a lower resolution than, that of a stock PPA. To my ear, the portrayal of the sound from the cmoy is very different, and less enjoyable for its differences. In the comparisson to a stock PPA, the Go-Vibe beats the PPA in crystal clarity and visceral texture. The PPA provides superior SQ in sufficiently many other categories to make it well worth the price difference, though. In fact, it wasn't until I recently installed a Larocco Dyno-Biased Diamond Buffer into my PPA that its clarity and visceral texture match those of my Go-Vibe.
So, FWIW, that's my SQ comparisson between a cmoy (which I enjoy) from a well-regarded builder on Head-Fi and the Go-Vibe. In My Rig(s), To My Ears, YMMV.