[anetode]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omega17TheTrue /img/forum/go_quote.gif Personally i don't use it because its bad for the health, despite all the waves around, less is always better. And high sensible component like high-end audio can be affected too.

Any reasoning behind this or is it just a personal quirk?

Wi-Fi, when functioning properly, will do fine. If you are using it in a house and you have no other 2.4ghz devices, you shouldn't have a problem.

 

[tjohnusa]

Quote:

Originally Posted by anetode /img/forum/go_quote.gif Any reasoning behind this or is it just a personal quirk? Wi-Fi, when functioning properly, will do fine. If you are using it in a house and you have no other 2.4ghz devices, you shouldn't have a problem.

Really...I smell a tinfoil hat!

 

[Omega17TheTrue]

Quote:

Originally Posted by anetode /img/forum/go_quote.gif Any reasoning behind this or is it just a personal quirk? Wi-Fi, when functioning properly, will do fine. If you are using it in a house and you have no other 2.4ghz devices, you shouldn't have a problem.

More like a quirk but RFI are well know for long for health problem and mental disturbance, mind you a frequency that pulse at more than 2 billion pulsation per second obviously have effect on health specially with all the other equipment that emit (cellphone,cellphone relay,radio,wi-fi etc...)

Its exist some people that are very sensible to any high frequency generator like wi-fi and must move to desert place to feel better.

Even in some library in france the wifi have been deactivated because of people complaining of headhache.

So i prefer not using it and beside its very ironic to use frequency to transport data when you see the price of audiophile cables.

 

[Spektra]

Consider this: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/701992503/the-worlds-only-earbuds-with-no-strings-attached
Peronally, I find the idea quite interresing. That is, if you can live with 24 songs.