[Drubbing]

There are lots of facts both proving that the landing was fake and true, but no matter what how much time passed since then and people still argue about that? I guess in the world here are problems that really worth our attention. Some people say that the photos made there are fake, but at that time the photoshop industry wasn't developed, how you think they made them - with scissors and glue?

There are NO facts the landing were faked. Only conspiracy theories. Everything about it being faked has been debunked years ago, by numerous reputable independent sources. Key points. This was the cold war, the Russians were tracking the lunar module every step of the way. If it was faked, they'd be telling the world. They were trying to get there first.

Maintaining communications between the module and MC was a global effort - something NASA PR doesn't shout about.
There were no satellites comms back then, so NASA relied on radio telescopes like Parkes in Australia and others in Europe to provide the communications between mission control and the module. Australia broadcast the audio and video of the actual landing back to NASA. Fake that.

The main reason the conspiracy exist is firstly, the inherent, and the millions of dumb people that inhabit it. Also, we have a whole generation who weren't there and simply cannot fathom that their phone has more computing power than the space program, so it "couldn't" be done. You don't need computing power to launch rockets and track them.

 

[Spareribs]

 

[BobG55]