Eagle_Driver
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2001
- Posts
- 6,496
- Likes
- 61
I voted for "It depends."
RAW is nice - if you intend to post-process the ****** out of that image file as soon as possible using a photo editing software package which supports the files from your particular camera. But be advised that no image should be archived in that format. This is because nobody knows when a photo editing software ceases supporting RAW from a particular camera. (Imagine a certain older version of a popular software package supports RAW from your camera, only to have newer versions of that same software no longer supporting RAW from your camera even with a patch.) As such, before archiving, RAW files should be converted and resaved into a more universally-supported format such as JPEG.
I shoot in JPEG if I already know that the image would be going directly to a print or an onscreen image, with little (if any) post-processing.
RAW is nice - if you intend to post-process the ****** out of that image file as soon as possible using a photo editing software package which supports the files from your particular camera. But be advised that no image should be archived in that format. This is because nobody knows when a photo editing software ceases supporting RAW from a particular camera. (Imagine a certain older version of a popular software package supports RAW from your camera, only to have newer versions of that same software no longer supporting RAW from your camera even with a patch.) As such, before archiving, RAW files should be converted and resaved into a more universally-supported format such as JPEG.
I shoot in JPEG if I already know that the image would be going directly to a print or an onscreen image, with little (if any) post-processing.