good reviews? I guess the first impressions have been pretty good, but i personally feel that it's still a bit too early in it's design to say that much about the amp. There's been a few changes in the design recently, and i think the opinions on different configurations are still developing.
The gain is pretty much how much the amp amplifies your signal. It seems that almost everyone who has built their PINT so far uses a gain of 6, and that would also seem fine for your E5s.
There are also two major, overall PINT designs: the original one by tangent, and the "Mini^3" version. Both have their pros and cons, and you'll have to balance them to see which suits you. Tangent's design filters out something called DC offset. Too high of a DC offset can damage your headphones. However, tangent's design also has relatively high noise, and some find that the capacitor which filters it out may have a negative effect on sound quality. The Mini^3 version has low noise, but doesn't filter out DC offset. There's widely varying opinions on maximum safe DC offset, anywhere from 20mV to 100mV. I have an H3xx like you, and I would estimate the offset out of the headphone amp with a gain of 6 to be around 25mV max.
The other decision would be what opamp chips to use. These have the biggest influence on the sound. There are two opamps in the PINT design: one for the left/right channels and one for the ground channel. There are also two different chip models which seem to be the best for the PINT: the AD8397 and the LM6171. In general, there are two configurations which seem to be favored by most: AD8397 for all the channels, and AD8397 for the left/right with LM6171 for the ground. Filburt has compared these two in a post before:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Filburt
PINT #1 - Not "mini^3ified", AD8397 on L/R, LM6172 on ground, gain 4.
Sound - Smooth with great detail and rather good soundstage and imaging for a portable. Has a nice amount of depth, relatively speaking. The sonic 'feeling' is that of the LM6172 keeping the aggressive 8397 in check.
PINT #2 - "mini^3ified" with AD8397 on both. Gain is still 4. More aggressive sound to it, and more forward. A bit brighter as well on upper mids it seems like. Soundstage and depth seems to be less than on PINT1.
I can try to elaborate more if necessary, but perhaps this will help. I prefer #1 for classical and jazz, and prefer #2 for rock and metal.
|
Apart from the sonic differences, the AD8397 chip takes A LOT of battery power. With the LM6171 as the second opamp, you are significantly increasing the battery life of your amp.
Most likely your amp builder might be able to provide you with more advice.
Hopefully I didn't get too technical =)