Pimeta capacitors
Nov 1, 2004 at 3:24 AM Post #16 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by bg4533
OPA637/627

Things are a bit too smooth and less dynamic than I wanted. Detail is improved, but not quite as much as I expected.



I'm no expert, but maybe you should consider changing your opamps to AD8020/AD8010?
 
Nov 1, 2004 at 4:00 AM Post #17 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by sanaka
I hope the more knowledgable will chime in here, but I think the ground channel buffer(s) 'override,' orincrease, or, uh, buffer, the 20mA limitation of the TLE. Otherwise it would be quite rediculous, wouldn't it?

Peace,
Sanaka



I thought the idea was for the caps to supply what the TLE can't handle directly?

I should have checked to see if the power supply was becoming unbalanced under load before I pulled the TLE out.
 
Nov 1, 2004 at 6:34 AM Post #18 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by setmenu
The best mod I can think of for the Pimeta is to ditch the Buf 634's and
replace them with Intersil HA 5002's
icon10.gif


Setmenu



Is the HA-5002 sounds superior than the BUF634? Do you mind to elaborate how the HA-5002 sound compare to BUF634?
 
Nov 1, 2004 at 7:10 AM Post #19 of 31
Hmm.. very interesting, I found my pimeta clone with AD8620 to be very dynamic and detailed. Of course, the design I used do have a slight difference in that I used an OpAmp as a buffer after the TLE and the capacitors are NOT rails to ground but rail to rail.
 
Nov 1, 2004 at 9:53 AM Post #20 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by bpribadi
Is the HA-5002 sounds superior than the BUF634? Do you mind to elaborate how the HA-5002 sound compare to BUF634?


It is a while since i did a back to back comparison.
When I first built the Pimeta I was not too keen on the sound, finding the
sound a little 'veiled' and the bass a bit off.[for my own tastes]
Raising the 634 quiescent current [bandwidth pin] improved things but the
overall character still seemed to remain.
I then noted that the well thought of PPA amp used different buffers, the
HA5002's so I gave them a try and found the sound opened up and the bass
became more natural sounding, to my ears a night and day improvement..
No doubt some here would still prefer the 634, but they are not my bag at all,
I cannot imagine ever again wanting to use these buffers in an audio application.


Setmenu
 
Nov 1, 2004 at 2:04 PM Post #22 of 31
Just the BUF634. Monolithic buffers aren't like opamps, in that there isn't a standard pin out for them. When I have a little bit of time, I might look at discrete buffers for the PIMETA, but it might not be worth the effort...

g
 
Nov 1, 2004 at 2:10 PM Post #23 of 31
ah well
frown.gif
i just thought it might be another way to waste my precious time
wink.gif
600smile.gif
 
Nov 1, 2004 at 2:21 PM Post #24 of 31
My guess right now, is that with the TLE in place the buffers were never really getting into wide bandwidth mode. Now, using resistor divider, they can draw all the current they want and actually operate in wide bandwidth.

I really wish I'd done some current measurements before the change.


[edit]
I should also point out that the reason I was able to get away with this trick is that I've got a 24V power supply so I didn't have to care if the rail splitter isn't perfectly accurate. It's probably a bad idea for 9V batteries or even 12V wall warts.
 
Nov 1, 2004 at 7:07 PM Post #25 of 31
Quote:

Now, using resistor divider, they can draw all the current they want


Ohm's Law tells you this is bogus. You can't "draw all the current you want" from a resistor. You will get a voltage drop across it, which in the case of the virtual ground means you shift the ground point around.

In any case, current limiting is not a problem for the TLE in the PIMETA. The only currents it has to manage are down in the microamps range! The heavy load is handled by the ground channel.

As for the buffer change, yes, going to HA-5002s should improve things a lot. The BUF634 does indeed have a politeness to it. The reason I chose the BUF634 for the PIMETA is its low current consumption. This is primarily a portable amplifier design, so low current draw is important. The PPA, by contrast, is "portable" only in a very limited sense, so we can get away with using the 5002s.
 
Nov 1, 2004 at 7:21 PM Post #26 of 31
Tangent is correct, but if one is prepared to use a battery pack comprised of AAA nimh cells reasonable run times can be had in a portable setup.
I use the 5002 in a portable setup but singles rather than stacks, so 3 of these will draw about 24ma + whatever your chosen opamps use.
I get run times around 13 hours.
So it can be reasonably practical if one is not after smallest/lightest amps.

And one other point, the 5002 has no built in short circuit protection!


Setmenu
 
Nov 2, 2004 at 12:32 AM Post #29 of 31
Glad to see some more interest in the pimeta.

I going to be doing some upgrades to mine soon. Including a Par Metal case, a DC jack, Class A bias, Wima caps and a stepped attenuator too.
 
Nov 2, 2004 at 2:31 AM Post #30 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by Madcat05
Glad to see some more interest in the pimeta.

I going to be doing some upgrades to mine soon. Including a Par Metal case, a DC jack, Class A bias, Wima caps and a stepped attenuator too.



As someone who just built a rather high end Pimeta I suggest you consider a PPA. I have never heard a PPA, but I am currently wishing I would have built one.

Don't listen to me though as I don't really know what I want. Well, I want everything....on a college students budget. I am looking for something that is warm and "thick", a tube amp I think.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top