Onkyo DX-7555
Nov 22, 2006 at 11:03 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 31

prescient

Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Posts
73
Likes
41
Thinking about using this for a source as my craptastic 10 yr old Samsung DVD seems to be on its last legs.

Anyone know anything about it? Good, bad or ugly?

I think my other options is the Lite CD-15 but I can't find one review of that unit anywhere reputable.

All input is welcome.

Thanks
 
Nov 22, 2006 at 5:00 PM Post #2 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by prescient /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Thinking about using this for a source as my craptastic 10 yr old Samsung DVD seems to be on its last legs.

Anyone know anything about it? Good, bad or ugly?

I think my other options is the Lite CD-15 but I can't find one review of that unit anywhere reputable.

All input is welcome.

Thanks



For $600, I'd look into this deal instead.

http://cgi.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/auc....lay&1164772013
 
Nov 22, 2006 at 6:48 PM Post #3 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by prescient /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Thinking about using this for a source as my craptastic 10 yr old Samsung DVD seems to be on its last legs.

Anyone know anything about it? Good, bad or ugly?

I think my other options is the Lite CD-15 but I can't find one review of that unit anywhere reputable.

All input is welcome.

Thanks



The current issue of The Absolute Sound has a glowing report of the Onkyo CD player.
 
Nov 22, 2006 at 9:27 PM Post #4 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by soundboy /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The current issue of The Absolute Sound has a glowing report of the Onkyo CD player.


tell me more, please, scan, steal, write, i'd like to know what they're saying
basshead.gif


Onkyo looks interesting on paper but reviews are still rare
mad.gif
 
Nov 26, 2006 at 8:38 AM Post #5 of 31
From the latest issue of Absolute Sound

Onkyo’s DX-7555 is a single-disc twochannel
CD player with advancements once
found only in the priciest products—a highisolation/
anti-resonant chassis, a low-jitter
clock circuit, and a Wolfson Microelectronics
digital-to-analog converter capable of
192kHz/24-bit resolution. Unusual features
include two user-selectable output filters,
either the factory-default “sharp” setting,
claimed to be flat to 20kHz, or a gradual highfrequency
roll-off. The “direct digital” coaxial
output (via a dedicated cable instead of circuit
board traces) can be shut off while using the
analog outputs; the analog output’s phase can
be reversed “on the fly” using the remote; and
the display can be dimmed in four steps.

An extremely unusual feature allows some
alteration of the clock frequency, faster or
slower than the factory setting. Onkyo claims
this can affect the clarity of sound or the size
of the acoustic image. I have many doubts
about the wisdom of giving users easy access
to precision settings—especially one hyped
as accurate within ±1.5ppm—and didn’t
experiment with the clock. On the other
hand, it does give tweak-obsessed audiophiles
something to play with.

The DX-7555 supports standard CD,
CD-R/RW, and MP3-encoded discs, in
sequential play, random play, memory
playback, or repeat modes. Coupled to the
A-9555, driving the Paradigm Studio 20
v.3, the Onkyo disc player offered a fine
combination of easy use, stable playback,
immunity from external vibration, and
airy, open, grain-free sound. It’s as capable
of communicating the emotional truth
of superb vocal music (Renée Fleming,
above) and instrumental nuance as any
disc player on the market up to a few
thousand bucks—in the two-channel realm,
it held its own against the Lexicon RT-20,
a $5000 multichannel universal-disc player.
It’s a great bargain at $600, one especially
recommended for those with no interest in
SACD, DVD-A, or multichannel playback.

Some very practical, textbook technology
types still believe that cables can’t make
much difference, especially with inexpensive
equipment. I would argue that they can make
a proportionally bigger improvement with
products like the Onkyo and Paradigm than
they do with big-bucks gear. AudioQuest,
Kimber Kable, and Nordost are but
three high-end cable makers known for
demonstrating the sonic improvements cable
upgrades can bring to budget electronics.
Here’s a simple example: The standard
throwaway interconnect that came with
the disc player was adequate, but rendered
an uninvolving acoustic. Simply replacing
that generic cable with a Chord “Siren” of
the same length changed everything for the
better: deeper, more enveloping soundstage,
richer harmonics, more cleanly etched detail
with a decrease in harshness. You might be
tempted to hook up $800 loudspeakers with
hardware-store zip cord, but upgrading to
something like the Red Rose 336 (a steal at
$5/ft.) can elevate a high-quality entry-level
system into something extraordinary.

With a Tributaries TX-500 line conditioner
supplying the power, I went “all the way” with
cabling, trying the Onkyo/Paradigm system
with the best stuff I had on hand, Nordost
SPM speaker cables and interconnects. The
irony of using cables that cost many times
more than the components they connected
wasn’t lost on me, but doing so eliminated
the “choke points” that would ordinarily
prevent most listeners from hearing all that a
system has to give. Running “flat out,” so to
speak, the Onkyo/Paradigm combo was an
absolute delight. As a team or as individual
components, they offer incredibly high value
at astoundingly reasonable prices.
 
Nov 26, 2006 at 3:48 PM Post #6 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by prescient /img/forum/go_quote.gif
From the latest issue of Absolute Sound

Onkyo’s DX-7555 is a single-disc twochannel
CD player with advancements once
found only in the priciest products—a highisolation/
anti-resonant chassis, a low-jitter
clock circuit, and a Wolfson Microelectronics
digital-to-analog converter capable of
192kHz/24-bit resolution. Unusual features
include two user-selectable output filters,
either the factory-default “sharp” setting,
claimed to be flat to 20kHz, or a gradual highfrequency
roll-off. The “direct digital” coaxial
output (via a dedicated cable instead of circuit
board traces) can be shut off while using the
analog outputs; the analog output’s phase can
be reversed “on the fly” using the remote; and
the display can be dimmed in four steps.

An extremely unusual feature allows some
alteration of the clock frequency, faster or
slower than the factory setting. Onkyo claims
this can affect the clarity of sound or the size
of the acoustic image. I have many doubts
about the wisdom of giving users easy access
to precision settings—especially one hyped
as accurate within ±1.5ppm—and didn’t
experiment with the clock. On the other
hand, it does give tweak-obsessed audiophiles
something to play with.

The DX-7555 supports standard CD,
CD-R/RW, and MP3-encoded discs, in
sequential play, random play, memory
playback, or repeat modes. Coupled to the
A-9555, driving the Paradigm Studio 20
v.3, the Onkyo disc player offered a fine
combination of easy use, stable playback,
immunity from external vibration, and
airy, open, grain-free sound. It’s as capable
of communicating the emotional truth
of superb vocal music (Renée Fleming,
above) and instrumental nuance as any
disc player on the market up to a few
thousand bucks—in the two-channel realm,
it held its own against the Lexicon RT-20,
a $5000 multichannel universal-disc player.
It’s a great bargain at $600, one especially
recommended for those with no interest in
SACD, DVD-A, or multichannel playback.

Some very practical, textbook technology
types still believe that cables can’t make
much difference, especially with inexpensive
equipment. I would argue that they can make
a proportionally bigger improvement with
products like the Onkyo and Paradigm than
they do with big-bucks gear. AudioQuest,
Kimber Kable, and Nordost are but
three high-end cable makers known for
demonstrating the sonic improvements cable
upgrades can bring to budget electronics.
Here’s a simple example: The standard
throwaway interconnect that came with
the disc player was adequate, but rendered
an uninvolving acoustic. Simply replacing
that generic cable with a Chord “Siren” of
the same length changed everything for the
better: deeper, more enveloping soundstage,
richer harmonics, more cleanly etched detail
with a decrease in harshness. You might be
tempted to hook up $800 loudspeakers with
hardware-store zip cord, but upgrading to
something like the Red Rose 336 (a steal at
$5/ft.) can elevate a high-quality entry-level
system into something extraordinary.

With a Tributaries TX-500 line conditioner
supplying the power, I went “all the way” with
cabling, trying the Onkyo/Paradigm system
with the best stuff I had on hand, Nordost
SPM speaker cables and interconnects. The
irony of using cables that cost many times
more than the components they connected
wasn’t lost on me, but doing so eliminated
the “choke points” that would ordinarily
prevent most listeners from hearing all that a
system has to give. Running “flat out,” so to
speak, the Onkyo/Paradigm combo was an
absolute delight. As a team or as individual
components, they offer incredibly high value
at astoundingly reasonable prices.




thanks! tempting, huh?

but review is strange at least, he write about cables more than Onkyo...also, he didn't try to change clock parameters, i'd like to ask why not, because it is one of the main features on this Onkyo?
 
Nov 26, 2006 at 5:30 PM Post #7 of 31
That was just an excerpt from the article, it actually reviewed a pair of paradigm speakers, an onkyo receiver and the dx-7555. I just pulled out the part on the player.
 
Jan 23, 2007 at 3:06 AM Post #8 of 31
Can you please give us a summery of the review in regards to the Onkyo A-9555 Integrated amp that they used in this review?? Can you tell me what they liked and didn't like about the Onkyo A-9555? I'm thinking about purchasing it but can't really find much on web site reviews or forum users reviews. Thanks for any help!
 
Jan 23, 2007 at 8:41 PM Post #9 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by audiocvk /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Can you please give us a summery of the review in regards to the Onkyo A-9555 Integrated amp that they used in this review?? Can you tell me what they liked and didn't like about the Onkyo A-9555? I'm thinking about purchasing it but can't really find much on web site reviews or forum users reviews. Thanks for any help!


From stevehoffman.tv....

http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/sh...ighlight=onkyo
 
Jan 26, 2007 at 11:40 PM Post #10 of 31
Thanks for the info!

Well, I went ahead and purchased the Onkyo A-9555 and I'm very amazed and impressed by it! It puts out superb sound and very detailed while being smooth. It's not harsh, bright, or cause any ear fatigue. Has a very large wide sound stage. It's a great product! I still can't believe how good it sounds!
 
Jan 27, 2007 at 2:39 AM Post #11 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by prescient /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Thinking about using this for a source as my craptastic 10 yr old Samsung DVD seems to be on its last legs.

Anyone know anything about it? Good, bad or ugly?

I think my other options is the Lite CD-15 but I can't find one review of that unit anywhere reputable.

All input is welcome.

Thanks



go listen to it and judge for yourself.
 
Jul 26, 2007 at 3:01 PM Post #12 of 31
Sorry to revive an old thread. I'm just wondering if anyone has any further info on this cdp. A head-fier recently compared it to the Marantz CD5001 and preferred the Marantz. The specs and few reviews out there though indicate it might be better than the Marantz. I couldn't find much else though in the way of comparisons, particularly to similar or higher priced players.
 
Jul 26, 2007 at 5:24 PM Post #13 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by zotjen /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The specs...indicate it might be better than the Marantz.


Specs may be useful in telling you which of two is technically superior but the specs on CD players start from such a high point that it is extremely unlikely that you would be able to tell the difference between a DR of 90db and a DR of 96db ditto SNRs of 100 and 105 db. Noise and distortion levels on decent CD players are close to non existent, error rates are irrelevantly low, jitter is for 99% of players just a non issue. So as long as both have flat FRs you would have to look elsewhere for audible differences.
 
Jul 27, 2007 at 5:46 AM Post #14 of 31
Quote:

the specs on CD players start from such a high point that it is extremely unlikely that you would be able to tell the difference


I realize that specs are specs and ultimately you really need to listen to each player to determine the difference. I guess the reason I asked is because I'm thisclose to pulling the trigger on the Rega Apollo. However I'm still wondering if I can get a cdp for somewhat cheaper than the Apollo that's nearly as good. I came across the Onkyo today, and while everything I have read about it has been favorable, as I mentioned before, there hasn't been much in the way of comparisons.
 
Jul 27, 2007 at 11:52 AM Post #15 of 31
Quote:

Originally Posted by zotjen /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I realize that specs are specs and ultimately you really need to listen to each player to determine the difference. I guess the reason I asked is because I'm thisclose to pulling the trigger on the Rega Apollo. However I'm still wondering if I can get a cdp for somewhat cheaper than the Apollo that's nearly as good. I came across the Onkyo today, and while everything I have read about it has been favorable, as I mentioned before, there hasn't been much in the way of comparisons.



well, i had the same dillema. as far as i can tell, reviews are mixed blessings.
i have found test in some German magazine, where it has excellent review being described as "high end, and uber detailed ( hipper detailed)".
don't like that.

but, in some other reviews, it is described as CD on the "warmer balance", easy on the ears and so on. like that.

third say something in between. dunno what to think.

at the end, who knows
blink.gif


one thing is for sure: i will never buy Rega Apollo. i believe it has an excelent sound, but it seems like Beta Hardware to me
mad.gif
if that's not enough, Apollo goes UP in price since next month. its price in UK will be 598 Ł compared to previous 498Ł.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top