tyloh73
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2005
- Posts
- 145
- Likes
- 0
I have listened to my wavelength brick silver version/MIT ic/flying mole ca-s3/equinoxed k1000 for few days now and i actually have some free time tonight,so i decided to compare the Ic i just bought to the MIT ic.i listen to mit ic for few minutes then i switch to the other ic,I didn't expect any difference since I have tried some expensive ic in my speaker rig few years ago and I could never notice any differences between ics.so i change the ic,go out and have a smokes,come back and listen,i immediately notice something is missing in vocal,something i love about the vocal is gone,listen for few minutes more and now i am positive something is missing,i switch back to mit ic and arrggg.....the vocal and sound I love so much is back.
all i could say now is WOW,i didn't know IC could make such a big difference,now i am not sure if the lush mid actually is from the brick usb dac(i thought it was) or the ic....it's shame i have sold/return other dacs i owned,thus can't do A/Bing.
i am going to call acoustics zen tomorrow and order their matrix reference II IC,some people said MR II has some of the best midrange.
needless to say,i am a cable/IC believer now.
all i could say now is WOW,i didn't know IC could make such a big difference,now i am not sure if the lush mid actually is from the brick usb dac(i thought it was) or the ic....it's shame i have sold/return other dacs i owned,thus can't do A/Bing.
i am going to call acoustics zen tomorrow and order their matrix reference II IC,some people said MR II has some of the best midrange.
needless to say,i am a cable/IC believer now.