That sounds cool! So the Soloist: have you tried with HD600 and the bass is powerful and has good depth? If it's $500 and it offers improvement, it really is no problem, I can save up and get it for sure.
I reviewed the older Soloist before but note this is the $1,200 amp that replaced the HA160. It's the Soloist
SL version that's a little over $500.
https://headfonics.com/2013/04/the-soloist-by-burson-audio/
So for your point 1: does this mean cutting into the headphones in any way? I understand the current pads will completely be destroyed, correct? And what about HM 5 pads, any gluing required
You don't cut into the headphones and no do
not use glue as it could either be too thick and too stiff it can affect how the plastic frame fits back onto the earcup or leach out some residue somewhere.
All you're supposed to do is cut open the velour fabric on HD600 - either worn out original Sennheisers or third party pads that come with a similar plastic frame - so you can remove the foam and all the fabric. Then you insert that plastic frame into the HM5 earpads (if you get the angled pads, make sure you orient the frame and the earpads properly so they go on the headphone with the thicker part to the rear). Once it's in there you can see the leatherette covering some part of the plastic protrusion that will lock onto the earcup frame. Cut off excess leatherette and then just clip them back on. It'll make more sense if you remove the earpads now and look at the plastic mounting frame.
First pic here is how it would look when the HM5 earpad is mounted to the plastic clip. Note this is all velour - you need to get the hybrid leather+velour version or the all leather version.
https://imgur.com/a/OVS6T
Here's an adapter that I just found through Google so you don't have to tear up the stock earpads or any third party stock fit pads.
https://www.modhouseaudio.com/sennheiser-earpad-adapters/fz5hnljhxcvpcrybgsum5drj41umx0
2. No, not exactly... I understand what you describe and the skin sensory and furniture vibration is secondary effect, I was just implying an analogy. However, I am more precisely trying to describe the sound itself, it has more depth and accent from the speakers, even at low volume.
That's also partly due to the differences in how headphones work firing directly vs speakers firing into a larger space, although boosting the low end on the HD600 - either with very dense earpads or an equalizer should catch up a little bit.
That said, if you just mean texture and detail on the bass notes, you might still be expecting much more than what the HD600 can do considering even without the HM5 earpads and 35hz boost on the EQ I can still hear enough detail on slow tracks with delicate double bass plucking, although they do get some boost. What I needed the pads more for was harder hits on bass drums. Not that hardness was the only problem but the weaker low end makes the HD600 with the stock pads seem like the drums need to sound a little deeper.
I do see you offered LCD-2C as alternative, I am still learning and these are not planars, correct? And do these have strong bass to your taste?
They're more like the HD650 but with smoother, more nimble bass. If you ran metal on both the HD650 can sometimes have a slightly stronger thump; if you run a deliberately very bassy track or even a bass test on it, well, I've seen a chubby guy at a meet getting his cheeks wobbling as the LCD-2 earcups vibrated. HD6xx despite the plastic frames can't even do that (though that's not to say the frames aren't vibrating, just that it was vibrating in a very bad, obscures the bass kind of way on the older HD580). He set the LCD-2 on the desk and we can hear it "pounding" although it wasn't really pumping back and forth as a dynamic driver would.
Note that LCD-2 was being driven by a WooAudio WA6SE at the time, and even then was at really unsafe output levels. Although the advantage of both the HD650 and LCD-2 over the HD600 is that the latter has a 3500hz peak that can obscure what bass is actually there.