Quote:
Originally Posted by daltonlanny /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Hello,
I was reading some info on the Marantz Europe website about their new CD6002 CD player.
All the info I read sounded interesting.
I could not find anything about it on the Marantz USA website.
Does anyone have any idea why this unit is not available in the USA?
Does anyone know whether or not it might be available at a later date in the USA?
Any info would be appreciated.
Thanks.
|
Short answer: I think that Marantz thinks that they won't sell enough to make it worth their while.
Lo-o-o-ng answer:
An hour or so before starting
this thread, I emailed Marantz to find out about U.S. availability of the
CD6002 and said that I thought it would be cool if they offered it in gold. I figured since it was a Sunday I would not get a response until sometime Monday at the earliest. To my surprise, about two hours and twenty minutes later I received a response that said:
"In the US, we will only carry the CD5001, CC4001 and the SA8001." I assume the person responding was a weekend customer service representative.
Two days later, I received another response from an associate marketing manager for
Escient, Marantz, and
Snell Acoustics saying:
"Thank you for your interest in Marantz. We are not currently planning on the CD6002 for the US market. Should we bring it in, it would be in black."
If you are at all interested, I encourage you to
contact Marantz and let them know you'd like to see the CD6002 in the U.S. market.
A few weeks before coming across the CD6002, I had decided that I wanted a CD5001 (or possibly an SA8001). I knew
Cambridge Soundworks carried Marantz gear, so I figured I'd see if any area stores had them in stock. Then I realized that
Cambridge Soundworks closed
all of their brick & mortar locations about six months ago.
I went back to the Marantz website and looked for dealers in my area. I found one about 15 miles away in Massachusetts, and one about 30 miles away in New Hampshire.
I called the Mass dealer. It turned out not to be a store but the cell phone number of a custom home theater installer. He was very friendly and told me that he could order one for me. We talked about audio and home theater for about 15 minutes and he basically told me that
no one he deals with buys dedicated CD players anymore. It's all DVD players or hard drive-based systems. Of course, that's the business he's in, but keep in mind that he's listed as one of the few Marantz dealers in my well-populated area.
I then called the NH dealer and got a message saying that they wouldn't be around for a couple of weeks. Clearly not an actual store.
Around the same time, I went to
Tweeter to see what they had for CD players. They had exactly one, the 5-disc carousel Yamaha (I can't remember if it was the
CDC-697 or
CDC-685). Sort of the same story in the
Magnolia section of
BestBuy. I took a quick look around and the only CD player was a 5-disc Denon.
I think Marantz finds themselves in a tough segment of the market with their non-Reference line players. In my area, the dealers that sell that level of audio components are either closing their doors (Cambridge Soundworks) or attempting to recover from bankruptcy (Tweeter). Product-wise, below them, there's the cheap DVD and universal players; above them, the Hi(er)-Fi market. And that's not even getting into iPods and MP3 players and computer-based sources.
Marantz cannot really replace the CD5001 with the CD6002, since the CD6002 is priced 67% higher. If they add it to the existing line, you wonder whether it will take more business away from competitors like Cambridge Audio, or cannibalize sales from their own CD5001 and SA8001. If they don't bring it here, though, you have to wonder if they are just ceding that segment of the market to Cambridge Audio.
I think that sometimes we as enthusiasts over-estimate the sales potential of audio products, and I wonder if to a company the size of Denon/Marantz it might not be more practical to focus its resources on the larger home theater and the higher margin Reference Series audio markets. I hope that's not the case.