Bredin
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Posts
- 286
- Likes
- 11
The only difference I've noticed with foobar 1.0 is that I can turn down the buffer size to 50ms instead of 100ms.
Originally Posted by Bredin /img/forum/go_quote.gif The only difference I've noticed with foobar 1.0 is that I can turn down the buffer size to 50ms instead of 100ms. |
Originally Posted by Ham Sandwich /img/forum/go_quote.gif How are you running Foobar since you've got a Mac. Are you dual booting to Windows or are you running a VM or is there some other way? |
Originally Posted by sonci /img/forum/go_quote.gif OPS, thats a news, to all those that claim buffer playback size its not important! |
Originally Posted by Jubei /img/forum/go_quote.gif I am still on version v.0.9.6.9, which I only upgraded in the summer. Will probably upgrade to whatever the latest version is in the mid or end of the year when I do some hardware upgrades and/or windows reinstall. |
Originally Posted by Redcarmoose /img/forum/go_quote.gif Never used it before knew nothing about it. I thought wow......started using the new one right from the get go. Flac with Foobar sounds a little better than I-Tunes in my USB audio set-up. So for me, new with no clue about plug-ins, I love it! What a refreshing change from the slowness and mind control of I-Tunes. |
Originally Posted by Mikeb /img/forum/go_quote.gif There's a new Foobar version 1.0 available for download, used it last night through my headphones (Ultrasone Pro900/Little Dot MKV11amp) sound seems have improved. |
Originally Posted by Bojamijams /img/forum/go_quote.gif Come on man, you've been here since 2006. You should know better by now. |
Originally Posted by drizek /img/forum/go_quote.gif If there was any sound improvement it would only be with lossy codecs. |
Originally Posted by sonci /img/forum/go_quote.gif Do you guys reinstall over old installation, or uninstall first? |