My final impressions: Crow does not taste as good as chicken !
After listening to the Neko DAC for a week, I repeated the BenchMark-Stello-GS-1 test I wrote about in post #9.
I used two identically configured and built Shuttle computers to send optical signals to each DAC. I used foobar 9.6.3 and ASIO4ALL on both. I volume balanced the DACs with the foobar volume control. The Stello had to come down -7.61dB on the foobar volume scale.
I used a number of high bit rate internet radio stations and the same music I used on my first evaluation.
First, I'd like to say that until you volume balance you don't have a clue. Second, unless you can A-B during a track, you're relying on your audio memory, and I don't care who you are, your audio memory is lousy, and by the time you disconnect and reconnect cables and reset the volume you have lost your reference point and any impression you think you have is extremely unreliable. This has happened to me more than once and I'm here to tell you that Crow does not taste good. All my initial impressions were nothing more than imagination.
Now the results:
After 2 hours of intense testing and comparing the two DACs with my 650s and GS-1 I have come to the conclusion that I cannot tell the difference between them. Unlike the BenchMark test, which was under meet conditions, this was in a completely silent environment and as far as I'm concerned, these two DACs sound the same. I haven't been able to hear any nuances or differences. Attack, decay, bass, treble, presence, clarity.... all sound the same.
After all the differences I thought I heard with my M^3 rig, it was rather sobering to flip the input switch back and forth on the GS-1 and not hear any differences at all.
Now it may be that after a longer period of listening I might be able to identify some small aspect of differentiation between the two DACs...... but it would really be splitting hairs if I could and might be past the resolution of my system or my ears.
[[ I switched the optical cables and computers and still found no noticeable difference. I could not switch the RCA cables because the Neko uses RCA to XLR, but for the record I used Dayton 18" RCAs on the Stelo and 1.5ft
Mogami Cable XLR Female to RCA Male on the Neko. Optical cables were Dayton glass and Dayton plastic, 1.5ft and 12ft respectively. ]]
To complicate matters I disconnected the Neko and connected my Constantine to the GS-1 and compared it to the Stello. The Stello volume had to be lowered -3.22dB to match the Constantine and then.... you guessed it... no noticeable difference listening to the Cream's "White Room" or Vienna Teng's "In Another Life" on an internet radio station at 192kbps. I don't know what happened to all the extra bass I thought I heard from the Stello (that the Constantine didn't have). The vocals might seem crisper on KT Tunstall's "Funnyman", but not by much if at all. Maybe the Stello is a little more refined than the Constantine but I'm too burned out to be sure.
This is all quite surprising to me, ... food for thought......
USG