Philco
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2005
- Posts
- 296
- Likes
- 0
Quote:
Not true at all, IMHO. My E888 are MUCH flatter (read better) sounding and have a LOT more extension (both bass and treble). Really, the E888 is in a class of it's own. The MX400 is just a poor cheapo middy earbud. The MX400 is all low-mids with no extension in the highs or lows.
Quote:
It's all a matter of taste. Do you prefer only mids with no extension or treble cup resonances? I choose the fake treble over the NO treble at all.
Originally Posted by DoNotBugMe I've heard now that the MX400 are comparable to the Sony e888s? How true is this? |
Not true at all, IMHO. My E888 are MUCH flatter (read better) sounding and have a LOT more extension (both bass and treble). Really, the E888 is in a class of it's own. The MX400 is just a poor cheapo middy earbud. The MX400 is all low-mids with no extension in the highs or lows.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle_Driver I don't care much for the lower end of the Sony E8x8 line. Their housings ring (too many resonances), adding false treble response and making those earbuds sound tinny. |
It's all a matter of taste. Do you prefer only mids with no extension or treble cup resonances? I choose the fake treble over the NO treble at all.