jinp6301
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Posts
- 3,910
- Likes
- 12
Originally Posted by Calihan /img/forum/go_quote.gif Was looking at the 0404 usb and it looks good. Is the sound quality better than the audigy 2 zs? I assume so from all the good reviews the thing gets. If I got one of those, I would just hook up it via usb obviously, then use 1/4" trs cables straight to the speakers? That would be using a balanced system then, correct? Then do I need a split for the subwoofer then? Where would I hook that up? |
Originally Posted by Calihan And how are the 0404 usb/pci different? They both have the 1/4" trs outputs, is the usb different internally than the pci version? |
Originally Posted by Calihan And if I did get the 0404 usb, would I somehow be able to keep my audigy 2 zs inside the computer for when I use EAX for positional audio? And then use the 0404 usb when I wanted to use the speakers? I know I wouldn't be using the speakers if I was using the audigy, I would use headphones for that. |
Originally Posted by Calihan And I suppose for how much I'll be using these speakers/sub, I might as well go for a sub thats balanced, so keep in step with the speakers? Any suggestions? I suppose 200-300 max for budget. |
Originally Posted by infinitesymphony /img/forum/go_quote.gif Most people who buy active monitors also go with a studio subwoofer, because they tend to have pass-through capability (signal input and output), which helps to keep the volume equal between the subwoofer and speakers. |
Originally Posted by mojo /img/forum/go_quote.gif Sorry if I'm being a bit thick but presumably this is only any good if you have something like the EMU 0404 USB which has a volume control on it. For those of us with internal sound cards and only digital volume control, we need monitors more like the Swans with front volume controls and no sub...? |
Originally Posted by mojo I am a bit like the OP. I want something not too expensive for listening, mainly as BGM. For serious listening I have 'phones. But having become used to high end sound all the multimedia rubbish that seems to be the only option in my price range in the UK doesn't cut it. |
Originally Posted by infinitesymphony /img/forum/go_quote.gif Or, you could just use the master volume slider in the Windows Mixer. It can be a little dangerous, since some applications like to ramp up the volume to 100%, but if you're using active monitors, many of them have an attenuator knob that you can use to set the maximum output to prevent blowing your ears. ![]() |
Originally Posted by infinitesymphony /img/forum/go_quote.gif What about a pair of 2.1 computer speakers like the Klipsch ProMedia 2.1? These are pretty much the best budget 2.1 set available at the moment. If you don't mind buying used, look for Boston Acoustics models on eBay. Specifically these models: Media Theater, BA7800, BA7900. |
Originally Posted by mojo /img/forum/go_quote.gif Do these look like the sort of thing you would recommend? http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Boston-Acousti...QQcmdZViewItem As for the Klipsch, I have heard that the new weird looking ones are not up to much. Do you mean the older boxy ones? |
Originally Posted by mojo /img/forum/go_quote.gif Doesn't the master volume knob use digital volume attenuation though? Or does it depend on the sound card and drivers etc? |
Originally Posted by mojo Do these look like the sort of thing you would recommend? http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Boston-Acousti...QQcmdZViewItem |
Originally Posted by milkpowder /img/forum/go_quote.gif I can't imagine the Bostons to be anything but mediocre to be honest ![]() |
Originally Posted by mojo As for the Klipsch, I have heard that the new weird looking ones are not up to much. Do you mean the older boxy ones? |
Originally Posted by milkpowder The newer "weird looking" Klipschs have pretty uninspiring reviews. They're apparently not as good as the original ProMedia 2.1s. I'm under the impression that the ProMedia 2.1 system is the very best there is, but unfortunately couldn't track a set down in the UK. |
Originally Posted by milkpowder I'm guessing powered monitors is the only way forward until one has the means to purchase a proper pre/poweramp-passive speaker rig. |
Originally Posted by infinitesymphony /img/forum/go_quote.gif Aww... I think that Boston's speakers are far better than mediocre, especially for computer speakers. Of course, it depends which Boston set we're talking about, since the miniature ones can't deliver the performance of the regular lines. |
I hadn't heard that there was a new model... I thought that this was the only one:![]() Can you point me to the new ones? |
Some people start on the active/balanced path and never return. Accuracy is much easier to achieve when the speaker manufacturer designs and includes the power amplifier. The less possible configurations, the better; this is why Apple doesn't allow regular people to assemble their own OSX-running computers. ![]() |
There is some truth in this, but I can't believe a set of active/balanced monitors sounding better (from an audiophile's perspective, not a mastering engineer) than a well amped set of ProAc monitors or Sonus Faber Cremona Auditors![]() |
Originally Posted by infinitesymphony /img/forum/go_quote.gif Ah, I've seen those before, but they're the GMX A model... According to Klipsch's page, they've been made since 2003. Have the original ProMedias finally been discontinued? According to the specs, the older set seems to have more power going to the satellites (14 wpc in GMX vs. 55 wpc in regular) and the subwoofer has the same rating in both... So I'd imagine the older ones might sound better. They certainly have nicer-looking enclosures. ![]() |
Didn't I see in another thread that you had a room with Chord and Esoteric gear going into some JMlab Diva Utopia Bes? I'd probably be sold on passive gear if I had access to that rig. ![]() |
As you say, it depends on your goal: musicality or accuracy. The former is probably easier to achieve when you can swap out every component to suit your tastes. Still, not all active speakers are neutral or accurate; some are voiced for a more pleasant listening experience (ex. Dynaudio BM15A). Maybe there's a balanced speaker out there for you. |
Originally Posted by mojo /img/forum/go_quote.gif Us brits read all these threads about $50 super sounding speakers from Best Buy or the vast array of monitors available. Why is it the main goal of British retailers seems to be to limit your choice as much as possible? |
Originally Posted by milkpowder /img/forum/go_quote.gif LOL! Importing is always an option, but one would have to expect to pay about 2 times the US retail price due to expensive shipping costs, import duties and sales tax. Even bloody KSC75s cost 10 quid here! They're 10 dollars in the States! I'm going to blame Gordon Brown ![]() |
Originally Posted by milkpowder /img/forum/go_quote.gif I've kinda given up on the Logitechs for classical music...I really wonder what the THX badge means... Did George Lucas really approve of these? |
Originally Posted by infinitesymphony /img/forum/go_quote.gif Hey, you guys have Arcam, Harbeth, NAD, Naim, and Rega... We have to import that stuff. ![]() |
My theory is that since the UK is geographically the furthest area from Japan/Asia, and because most of the gear comes from there, it takes more time and money to ship. Still, it's strange that the UK branches of worldwide companies continue to suffer from limited or lagging product distribution. |
Yes! They're approved to hit the reference level of 105 dB without "breaking, distorting, buzzing, rattling or any other distracting effects." Which says nothing about their sound quality or accuracy, of course. ![]() |