[zunehdrocks]

Anybody have any info?

 

[b0000]

http://www.innerfidelity.com/content/two-strike-zone-focal-spirit-professional-and-spirit-classic
 
It has the focal spirit pro/classic and hp50 compared.

 

[Me x3]

  http://www.innerfidelity.com/content/two-strike-zone-focal-spirit-professional-and-spirit-classic
 
It has the focal spirit pro/classic and hp50 compared.

+1

 

[KG Jag]

This is a two horse race between the NAD and FS Pro.  I happen to prefer the less expensive NAD, but sound brains attached to reasonable ears can go either way between the two.

 

[Za Warudo]

Be sure to audition them first or have a good return policy as both the NAD and FS have fit/comfort issue with some people. I did not like the comfort of the NAD at all.

 

[zunehdrocks]

Has anybody heard the dt150?

 

[KG Jag]

I have the DT 250, but have not heard the DT 150.  I know that both are 250 Ohm cans and you will need an amp, unlike the other two on your list.

 

[zunehdrocks]

  I have the DT 250, but have not heard the DT 150.  I know that both are 250 Ohm cans and you will need an amp, unlike the other two on your list.

What do you think of the dt250? Is it comparable to the Nads or spirit focals?

 

[KG Jag]

 

  I have the DT 250, but have not heard the DT 150.  I know that both are 250 Ohm cans and you will need an amp, unlike the other two on your list.

What do you think of the dt250? Is it comparable to the Nads or spirit focals?

It's a good can, but I like both the Spirits & NAD better.  Unlike the other two the DT 250 needs an amp.