NAD C542 Good Source for HD650 & SXH1?
post-811990
Thread Starter
Post #1 of 13

whmacs

New Head-Fier
Joined
May 10, 2004
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Joined
May 10, 2004
Posts
11
Likes
0
Hi All,
I've got a pair of HD650's on order with my local dealer. These are to replace my HD570's I'm currently using with my Perreaux SXH1 headphone amp. My dealer can also give me a good price on a NAD C542 cd player. Would this be a reasonable match for the HD650's and the SXH1? My other option would be a Cambridge 640C, but this would be arround $100 more than the NAD. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Stephen
 
     Share This Post       
post-812029
Post #2 of 13

Bill Ward

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Dec 8, 2003
Messages
1,792
Reaction score
12
Joined
Dec 8, 2003
Posts
1,792
Likes
12
The NAD 542 has a nicely defined bass register, which I appreciate. The Senns have good bass entension, which I enjoy. I found the combination to be a bit tubby on some program material.

BW
 
     Share This Post       
post-812045
Post #3 of 13

mxs1030

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 5, 2003
Messages
748
Reaction score
10
Joined
Oct 5, 2003
Posts
748
Likes
10
I can't speak for the NAD 542, but I have the 640c ( same amp/headphone as you ) and it's fantastic. Smooth midrange with punchy bass, non-fatiguing as well, I can listen for hours.
 
     Share This Post       
post-812057
Post #4 of 13

plainsong

Headphoneus Supremus: Untie!
Joined
Dec 4, 2002
Messages
6,452
Reaction score
25
Joined
Dec 4, 2002
Posts
6,452
Likes
25
It's not much of a scientific review, but the Senn 600s are great with this combo..

But I originally auditioned the Nad with senn650s (not as good an amp though - Project Headbox) - and even with that less-than-perfect amp, who said the Senn650s can't rock? I spent a couple of hours alone in a listening room so it's not as good as owning them, but better than a quicky-listen in a department store.
 
     Share This Post       
post-812075
Post #5 of 13

Megaptera

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
891
Reaction score
11
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Posts
891
Likes
11
I haven't heard the HD650 or the SXH1, but I'm really happy with my C542, using a Pimeta and HD580s (which are probably closer in sound to the 650s than your current 570s). It's a good enough combination for me that I don't feel compelled to upgrade the source or headphones anytime soon. (Though the Pimeta is getting upgraded to a PPA soon
) I'd be surprised if a C542/SXH1/650 system didn't sound great, frankly.
 
     Share This Post       
post-812631
Post #6 of 13

whmacs

New Head-Fier
Joined
May 10, 2004
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Joined
May 10, 2004
Posts
11
Likes
0
Guys,
Thanks for all the comments, I really appreciate people taking the time to reply. I was particularly interested in Bill's comments about the bass being a bit on the 'tubby'side at times with the NAD+HD650 combo. This gives me a little bit of concern about the NAD. I suggested the NAD and Cambridge as they are around the same price ($600 NAD, $700 Cambridge). The NAD is sold through my local dealer (which I have a good relationship with) while the Cambridge is sold through a local home electronics 'Super Store'. The other brand of CD player sold by my local dealer (which I would prefer to give my business to) is Rotel. He also carries the RCD-02 ($800) and the RCD-1072 ($900). These are getting a bit more in price than I wanted to spend, but I would consider them if people thought that they are worth the extra dollars. When I go to pick up my HD-650's (can't wait!), I'll take my SXH1 along with me and try out the NAD and Rotel players. Any thoughts on the Rotel's just to confuse things even more or is the extra money not worth it over the C542 or 640C?

Thanks again,
Stephen
 
     Share This Post       
post-812952
Post #7 of 13

tyrion

Can Jam '08 Lead Organizer
Joined
Dec 25, 2003
Messages
10,901
Reaction score
32
Joined
Dec 25, 2003
Posts
10,901
Likes
32
I have the NAD 541i and the perreaux sxh-1, Senn hd650 combo. I listen to rock, jazz and some classical. I find it to be a very nice combination. I would imagine the 542 would be as well.
 
     Share This Post       
post-813482
Post #8 of 13

Geek

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
May 5, 2002
Messages
1,810
Reaction score
10
Joined
May 5, 2002
Posts
1,810
Likes
10
You'll be able to get the HD650s to sound just fine with the source you currently own and probably expect an improvement from the NAD source. However, you will have to spend over $2,000 on a source, $1,500 on an amp, and over $300 in interconnects to reach the HD650's potential, and realise what kind of headphone they truly are. Just be aware of it. Look at my signature. If you are truly disappointed in the sound of the HD650s consider hearing them on $4000 of associated equipment. Don't join the sennheiser-sucks crowd unless you put the HD650s in the right environment first, and then decide that they aren't good at their full potential.

Cheers,
Geek
 
     Share This Post       
post-813487
Post #9 of 13

elnero

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Messages
6,081
Reaction score
489
Location
Prince Edward Island, Canada
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Location
Prince Edward Island, Canada
Posts
6,081
Likes
489
Stephen, where are you located?
 
     Share This Post       
post-813509
Post #10 of 13

Bill Ward

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Dec 8, 2003
Messages
1,792
Reaction score
12
Joined
Dec 8, 2003
Posts
1,792
Likes
12
$4000 in associated equipment to bring the HD650 to full potential?

Based on what? Your opinion? your experience? Your equipment? The Senns will sing with a Perreaux, and any of the cdps mentioned will serve them admirably. Headphone hifi is cost-effective precisely because a relatively modest investment can yield remarkable levels of performance and listening pleasure. One need not feel disadvantaged because of limited means, and I don't think the Senns are well-served by a statement that they demand a $4k expenditure to reach their full potential.

BW
 
     Share This Post       
post-813994
Post #11 of 13

whmacs

New Head-Fier
Joined
May 10, 2004
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Joined
May 10, 2004
Posts
11
Likes
0
Quote:

Originally Posted by elnero
Stephen, where are you located?


Hi Elnero,
Just updated my profile, I'm an Aussie which explains why all the prices I've quoted are in Australian dollars and seem so high.


cheers,
Stephen
 
     Share This Post       
post-814033
Post #12 of 13

pbirkett

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 12, 2002
Messages
3,233
Reaction score
46
Joined
Jun 12, 2002
Posts
3,233
Likes
46
Geek,

You are jumping the gun a bit dont you think? Nobody hear has even criticised the 650's, and although you are correct (the 650's potential will be met with higher amps and sources), the 650's should sound nice from one of those players and that amp. Maybe not up to its potential, but it will still sound nice IMO. What is the use of your above statement when its clear that the original poster does not have that kind of budget?
 
     Share This Post       
post-814078
Post #13 of 13

elnero

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Messages
6,081
Reaction score
489
Location
Prince Edward Island, Canada
Joined
Jul 24, 2002
Location
Prince Edward Island, Canada
Posts
6,081
Likes
489
Quote:

Originally Posted by whmacs
Hi Elnero,
Just updated my profile, I'm an Aussie which explains why all the prices I've quoted are in Australian dollars and seem so high.


cheers,
Stephen



Actually because of the prices I thought you might be Canadian in which case I was going to direct you towards an excellent online retailer that carries Cambridge.
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top