NAD 3020 vs NAD 1020A?
Apr 28, 2007 at 12:44 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 6

Freddi

New Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Posts
31
Likes
10
Anyone know how the 1020A holds up against the classic 3020? I've gotten the opportunity to buy a 1020A for next to nothing, but I don't know much about it...
 
Apr 28, 2007 at 12:48 PM Post #2 of 6
If I'm not mistaken, the 1020A is a preamp only.

The 1020 was the preamp of the series, the 2020 was the power amp, and the 3020 was the integrated amp.
 
Apr 28, 2007 at 12:59 PM Post #3 of 6
Yes, it is the preamp only. I plan on using it as a headphone amp together with a tt, so the main questions are if the phono in and headphone out are as good? Are they exactely the same except for the amp bit?
 
Apr 28, 2007 at 8:25 PM Post #4 of 6
If it's dirt cheap (say about what you could build a basic cmoy for), you might as well grab it, but honestly I don't think the headphone out on my 3020 is anything special. Not bad with my Audio Technicas, but awful with my Beyer DT-770 250s. (It may just not like the high impedance of the Beyers.)
 
Apr 28, 2007 at 10:02 PM Post #5 of 6
Well, I've bought it...
icon10.gif
Together with a 2150 amp with a blown fuse, defective cassette deck (6050C) and a 4125 tuner. All for about $120. I think it's a good deal. But we'll see when I get it...

I don't like what I hear about the DT770's, though. Hopefully they'll perform better with my 80ohm's!
 
Apr 28, 2007 at 10:47 PM Post #6 of 6
If the 2150 works OK with a new fuse, that's not too bad. I think I gave $85 for my 3020.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top