sgraphics
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2003
- Posts
- 76
- Likes
- 0
Ok first I gotta say that I'm a headphone newbie so if you are a newbie too.. you cant take me TOO seriously! Here are my thoughts on what I think about the KSC-35 after a day of listening.
The only headphones with what I have to compare are the closed, bassy Sennheiser HD202's. Both of these have a low price so when I say they sound good at something they might sound not so good at it compared to some $4k stax system if you know what I mean.
....
The sound precision is Great! I hear things (artifacts in sounds?) I am not used/supposed to hear and I like that. For example windows 'error' sound has a little hisss at the end
All the instruments are telling a little different story than with my Sennheisers.
Soundstage is close to perfect! The lower end seems to cut off at a certain Hz though.. so the bass is not deep, its more compact.
I tested several music styles and what I found out was that with real musical instruments the phones are excellent.. piano, bongo drums, guitar and even electric guitar in rock is very pleasant, clear and sound more "there" than with the 'modern'-sounding HD202's. I found myself really enjoying some old Phil Collins CD and that is not what I do
The vocals are balanced and overall the headphones are pleasant to hear but this is also the minus for me...
As I said they are very good for "normal" music.. but I listen to electronic music (trance, techno) and for that purpose they are a little bit too pleasant and dull. My HD202's are significally more exciting in that gategory. 202's have their own weaknesses (but thats another story). I've read here that the Beyerdynamic Dt770 is good for this kind of music?
So ending this great review
i would like to say that KSC-35's are not the best choice for electronic music (or at least thats my opinion).
PS. Can anyone tell me how does the Senn MX500 soundstage differ from KSC'35's?
The only headphones with what I have to compare are the closed, bassy Sennheiser HD202's. Both of these have a low price so when I say they sound good at something they might sound not so good at it compared to some $4k stax system if you know what I mean.
....
The sound precision is Great! I hear things (artifacts in sounds?) I am not used/supposed to hear and I like that. For example windows 'error' sound has a little hisss at the end
Soundstage is close to perfect! The lower end seems to cut off at a certain Hz though.. so the bass is not deep, its more compact.
I tested several music styles and what I found out was that with real musical instruments the phones are excellent.. piano, bongo drums, guitar and even electric guitar in rock is very pleasant, clear and sound more "there" than with the 'modern'-sounding HD202's. I found myself really enjoying some old Phil Collins CD and that is not what I do
As I said they are very good for "normal" music.. but I listen to electronic music (trance, techno) and for that purpose they are a little bit too pleasant and dull. My HD202's are significally more exciting in that gategory. 202's have their own weaknesses (but thats another story). I've read here that the Beyerdynamic Dt770 is good for this kind of music?
So ending this great review
PS. Can anyone tell me how does the Senn MX500 soundstage differ from KSC'35's?