JMS
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2002
- Posts
- 106
- Likes
- 19
I built my PPA about 3 months ago, using basically the standard recommended configuration/parts. I always thought it sounded a little thinner than my META42 (also built to standard configuration/parts), but figured it was due to the improved stereo separation. I hadn't done a serious subjective comparison between the META42 and the PPA, but when I tried them recently as a preamp for my C370 to power speakers, the difference became more apparent. The PPA sounded shrill, and somewhat lean on bass. I have a setup where I can switch the PPA/META42 (set to unity gain) in and out of the preamp loop, and the META42 sounded much closer to no-amp than the PPA. I don't think this difference is only true of the amps when serving as preamps -- the sound was consistent with what I heard through headphones (Senn HD580), only it was more obvious in this usage which sound was better and more accurate.
Now, I also measured the 2 in RMAA using the loopback method through an Audigy 2 NX, and both amps seem to measure as on Tangent's web site, where the only major difference is that the PPA has better stereo separation.
What's going on here? Perhaps my PPA is built wrong. The only non-standard thing I did was to use a low gain (3x), with R3-R6 of:
R3L/R: 1k
R3G: none
R4L/R: 2k
R4G: 4.7K
R5L/R: 3.32K
R6L/R: 1M
Could that be the culprit? Other values are:
R1L/R: 4.7K
R1G: 4.7K
R2L/R: 1M
R7L/R: 5K
R8: 100
R9: 1K
R11: 1K
R12: 1K
R13: 1K
R14: 1K
I hope it's something that can be fixed. Please help!
Now, I also measured the 2 in RMAA using the loopback method through an Audigy 2 NX, and both amps seem to measure as on Tangent's web site, where the only major difference is that the PPA has better stereo separation.
What's going on here? Perhaps my PPA is built wrong. The only non-standard thing I did was to use a low gain (3x), with R3-R6 of:
R3L/R: 1k
R3G: none
R4L/R: 2k
R4G: 4.7K
R5L/R: 3.32K
R6L/R: 1M
Could that be the culprit? Other values are:
R1L/R: 4.7K
R1G: 4.7K
R2L/R: 1M
R7L/R: 5K
R8: 100
R9: 1K
R11: 1K
R12: 1K
R13: 1K
R14: 1K
I hope it's something that can be fixed. Please help!