stan23
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2002
- Posts
- 804
- Likes
- 10
Sure I could have bought a pair of RS1's with the money I spent on this lens.. but I don't think i'll enjoy the RS1's as much
Originally posted by jaskin Sweet, I have the 2.8 non-IS version. Very sharp I'm sure you're going to be happy with it. Now all you need is a 1Ds. Stan, I'm not sure you need a 50mm 1.0 from what the reviews say it seems to be quite unusable at F1.0. I think the f1.4 version would be more economical and you can stock up other L lens. The 16-35 is a really sharp one. |
Originally posted by Sol_Zhen That's a serious lens. I miss my old Olympus. I was into SLR photography for a while when I was traveling. I have some great pics of somewhat unvisited (off the tourist circuit and in the jungle) Mayan ruins from Honduras, Guatemala, and Southern Mexico. Some cool macro detail shots and some wide scope shots. Even a couple in Honduras of an anti-revolutionary patrol of government troops having lunch in a Mayan plaza (shot from the top of a Mayan building). I need to find the negatives and convert them to digital. But lately, I just use a cheap point and click digital. |
Originally posted by stan23 Hey Sol_Zhen, now that sounds like a nice trip! I'm still wanting to do my asia trip with nothing on me but my camera gear + laptop. Now that would be fun. |