The Tea sounds quite a bit different from the NM2+. The NM2+ is extremely detailed for a single-DD IEM, with a ton of clarity. It is exciting (if you don’t find the upper midrange bothersome), but not the best IEM to just sit back and relax with. The Tea on the other hand is very smooth sounding, romantic, with a rich midrange (it is a midrange specialist), and good sub bass, but less mid bass, so as not to interfere with the midrange. The treble is well extended, with good clarity, but not the most micro detail. Both the NM2+ and Tea have wonderful soundstage imaging, but I think the Tea has a bit better instrument separation and placement, with better layering. The NM2+, however, has the best imaging of any single-DD IEM that I’ve heard thus far.
At least on this thread and on another forum, I haven‘t read about QC problems. I haven’t had any.
oh i thought tea and nm2+ more or less have similar tuning, cause i saw some post it that it quite analytical
yeah, i already bought nm2+ but still curious with this
thx for the info btw !