Mac OS Alternative to FB2K and EAC
Jan 23, 2005 at 11:45 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 9

silentperfection

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 14, 2003
Posts
231
Likes
0
Alright. Of course, I'm afraid that I already know the answer to this question but...what is the best ripper for Mac OS. I'm seriously considering the switch after getting a powerbook as a gift. Also, I have about 1500 albums in MPC which except for some commandline player in hyrdrogenaudio that someone came up with I believe is not at all usable in the Mac OS. Is that correct? Also, iTunes is fine but can it not play ogg at least? or flac as I have about 2000 albums in FLAC. What are my options and also especially in terms of ripping cds as I rip and rip and rip if I were to move to Mac OS.
 
Jan 24, 2005 at 6:56 AM Post #3 of 9
Jan 24, 2005 at 9:38 AM Post #5 of 9
If you really want to play Ogg files with iTunes, here are a few links I found with Google:

http://jsp.vs19.net/osx/oggtunes.php
http://members.optusnet.com.au/lbram...tunes-ogg.html
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.p...21103065300430

They're a bit old, but they should point you in the right direction.

Personally, I don't bother with Ogg, since it's not supported by the iPod. I suppose I could switch to a DAP that supports Ogg, but that's a whole different topic. For now, Apple Lossless and 320 AAC work just fine for me.
 
Jan 24, 2005 at 1:18 PM Post #7 of 9
Quote:

Originally Posted by silentperfection
Blessing do you use apple lossless? Just curious.


Yeah, I have copies of my music in apple lossless and 256 AAC. I upgraded from a 1G to 4G iPod primarily for lossless support, but the battery life drain was too much to warrant its use, so made the AAC versions of everything. Since I have the space I've kept the ALAC versions for home use, but have toyed with keeping just one. In fact I just got rid of a Roku Soundbridge primarily because it didn't have native ALAC playback (though I preferred the Airport Express sound overall). Rambling answer, but yes I use Apple Lossless.

I toyed with the same dual approach, but with FLAC, before ALAC came about. I used FLACer and MacFLAC to encode/decode and mostly Macamp Lite X for playback. When I switched I moved a few files over, but mostly reripped. If you go from FLAC to ALAC, just watch as you may lose your tags. FLAC, as you probably know, doesn't have great tag support, and WAV has none, so if you can find some process to go to AIFF instead of WAV, you may be ahead of the game. My FLAC files had zero tags, so it was easier to just rerip.

I've turned into a big fan of OS X after 19 years on the PC (and programming MS ASP during the day). I'd encourage you to give the platform a shot. Although on the audio side there are less options. the Apple system of AAC/ALAC (though MP3/WAV/AIFF are supported), iPod, iTunes/AirTunes, Rendezvous and Airport Express is actually pretty encompassing, once you get your music inside (right codec, etc.). it's nice now to open my laptop in the living room, launch iTunes, navigate music on my bedroom desktop and stream it to my stereo. Then again all that can be done on Windows too now (or with a combo household).

A couple other OS X only apps to look at:
iTunes-LAME encoder: http://www.blacktree.com/apps/iTunes-LAME/index.php
Wonderful audio programs from Rogue Amoeba: http://www.rogueamoeba.com/
Canz3D: http://www.midnightwalrus.com/Canz3D/ (works well with above Audio Hijack Pro).
 
Jan 24, 2005 at 8:31 PM Post #8 of 9
Yeah, I'm really starting to enjoy using the mac os. The only thing that still is holding me back is the fact that there is no way to know really if my rips are perfect. That bothers me even if I don't hear the difference. But yeah, I'll probably be buying a desktop in the near future and see how things turn out. Thanks for all the help all of you and if you have any more suggestions feel free to add. I know several people find this information useful.
 
Jan 24, 2005 at 9:07 PM Post #9 of 9
Last thing I'll say, is a perfect copy of a scratched disk, is another scratched disk. Although I'm still a big fan of EAC, I think it is over-hyped a bit here, and I'll take an audibly accurate copy over a data one anyday. A scratch is usally lost or corrupted info and if that's made transparent, I'm happy.

As others have pointed out, the CD hardware is much more important than the software.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top