Quote:
Originally Posted by somestranger26 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
What a waste of money; a single 5850 costs less for about the same performance and will use less power, less hassle with getting airflow to the card, upgradability by getting a second one, etc.
|
Very true. Very few Windows/DirectX games, even today, can take any advantage whatsoever of more than a single fast graphics card.
Quote:
Originally Posted by somestranger26 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
As far as hard drives are concerned, you do not want to use "green" (anything less than 7200rpm) drives for your OS/programs. They're good for storage and that's about it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ċãţ /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Those western digital green drives, I own one, they are like stuck at 5400rpm. Soooo slow. Get at least a 7200rpm hard drive.
|
Other "green" drives also spin at lower-than-7200rpm speeds. For example, the "green" Seagate Barracuda LP spins at only 5900rpm rather than the 7200rpm spindle speed of the Barracuda 7200.## series and the new Barracuda XT drives (the latter with a huge 64MB of cache and a SATA 3.0 interface).
Quote:
Originally Posted by somestranger26 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Why are you getting a gigabit PCI-e card when the motherboard already has it? Same goes for the USB card -- do you really need that many USB ports?
|
There is no need for more than one Gigabit Ethernet port on any PC (if you really need more than one Gigabit Ethernet port, a 4-port Gigabit Ethernet switch/router is a better bet than a second PCI-e Gigabit card). Second, most PCs have six to eight USB ports already; therefore, a second USB card is not only redundant, it may also cause device conflicts. If more USB ports are needed, an external USB hub is a better bet than a second internal USB card.
Quote:
7-7-7-## memory is only necessary if you're going to significantly overclock your i7 processor (most die-hard enthusiasts will do such a thing). 9-9-9-## is all you need if all you're going to do is stock speed. In addition, most lower-latency memory may need significantly higher DIMM voltage than the settings on most motherboards can provide. After all, what good is a particular company's 7-7-7-24 DDR3 memory if it requires a much higher voltage (2.1V) than JEDEC-standard 9-9-9-30 memory (~1.6V), to even run stably? (I made the last sentence because many so-called "overclocking-friendly" motherboards don't provide DIMM voltage settings above 1.8V or 1.9V.)
However, after looking at the Newegg link above, that OCZ 7-7-7-24 memory is designed to operate at a slightly higher DIMM voltage (1.65V) than the standard JEDEC reference voltage of 1.5V. If that's the case, then, I'd especially recommend it for most i7-compatible motherboards on the market (since 1.65V is within the manual DIMM voltage range of most enthusiast-friendly motherboards) if it costs only slightly more money than JEDEC-reference 9-9-9-## memory modules. (If you see 7-7-7-24 modules requiring a higher voltage than the reference 1.5V, then you can assume that they're native 9-9-9-## parts which have passed vendor testing at the tighter 7-7-7-## settings on a highly overclockable motherboard.)
Quote:
Again, if you're into overclocking this would be my route.
Quote:
Originally Posted by somestranger26 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Why oh why are you spending $600 on a processor... get an i7 920 and be done with it. You're better off lighting your wallet on fire than wasting so much money on a slight multiplier increase that you're not going to need unless you plan to overclock heavily and use water cooling. Put the money you saved into the graphics card and get an HD5970 and every game you play will kneel at your feet. GPU >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU for gaming.
|
Normally, with the proper motherboard I would go this route. But some motherboards do not allow overclocking or provide high enough voltage settings to allow such heavy overclocking. If the latter is the case, then it will cost you a lot of money for any speed increase.