Selrisitai
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2016
- Posts
- 50
- Likes
- 38
On the one hand, I'm happy to leave this comment unanswered. On the other, I'm concerned about misinformation, particularly when talking to newbies.LOL
Maybe 'good enough' for an 'MP3 player' but nah. Not saying more on the subject in this thread and enjoy your bliss.
Let's just say that all evidence I can find anywhere, including my own personal tests on $1,500 earbuds, all evidence that 320Kbps Mp3 is indistinguishable from uncompressed, with ONE exception: There are some very, very rare individuals who specifically train their ear to pick out a distinct, subtle artifacting in Mp3s that does not appear in every song.
This is not something 99% of people need to worry about from my understanding, so if that's what you're referring to, then I at least would say it doesn't justify scoffing at Mp3s when it's a 20-year-old format whose only problem seems to be a minor, imperceptible flaw that you have to actually train yourself to notice some of the time.
That said, I also don't want to present misinformation, so if you have evidence to the contrary, please present it so that me and the user above can be informed.
Last edited: