Lehmann Audio Black Cube Linear

May 9, 2005 at 1:07 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 7

Elephas

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Posts
3,259
Likes
15
I've just acquired a Lehmann Audio Black Cube Linear.

I've been using a B&W Aura CA200 preamp's headphone out for the past month with the Audio-Technica ATH-AD2000. It sounded better than the Pro-Ject Head Box, the only headphone amp I had. I listen to a wide variety of music primarily with iTunes on a PC through an E-MU 1212m.

Wanting better portable sound out of an iPod, I decided to buy a portable amp. After reading about the SuperMacro-3, I ordered one and received it last week. It is configured with the 4 switches and default NE5534 opamps.

The SM3 sounded amazingly good. It is definitely better than the Aura CA200, and much better than the Head Box. It was as if an epiphany hit, and I suddenly understood what imaging and soundstage meant in regards to headphone listening. I could pick out individual instruments and could hear new details with familiar music. Everything sounded better. The headphone and amp reviews and some of what other Head-Fi members write about began to make sense (though not all).

After hearing the SM3, I just had to upgrade to a better home amp. I brought the SM3 and AD2000 to the local headphone shop which carried the Lehmann Black Cube Linear. The shop allows customers to sit and listen to a variety of headphones, amps, and CD players.

I've become familiar with the sound of the AD2000 the past month, and could readily hear the difference while switching between the SM3 and the Lehmann.

The Lehmann sounded better than the SM3, but initially not by much. Going to the store, I assumed it would be difficult to find a better sound than the SM3. After trying different types of music, it became more apparent that the Lehmann provides a blacker background, better imaging, and a wider and deeper soundstage. Both amps have nice treble and incredible detail, especially with the AD2000.

I also tried the demo Senn HD650 and Beyer DT880 out of both amps. The SM3 had a harder time with both headphones, even with the impedence and amp gain switches. The Lehmann also has gain switches, and it matched the HD650 and DT880 very well. Both headphones sounded good with both amps, but I still preferred my AD2000. I had brief thoughts of buying a DT880 which were quickly vetoed by the wallet.

Now I'm wondering what a Meier Prehead MkII or SinglePower MPX3 sounds like.

LehmannBlackCube1.jpg


LehmannBlackCube2.jpg


LehmannBlackCubeSuperMacro.jpg
 
Feb 2, 2007 at 6:22 AM Post #4 of 7
Hello Elephas,

Could you please tell me a little bit the aura ca200 preamp ?
Not for headphones but for Tannoy D500 speakers.

I'm currently using integrated aura va100mkII (2x66W) but I plan to buy a CA200 and PA200 amp.

Is is the good way ?
Thank you so much,
Regards
 
Feb 2, 2007 at 7:30 AM Post #5 of 7
Hi, welcome to Head-Fi.

I no longer have the Aura CA200 preamp, which was used in a speaker system.

It worked very well for many years. Functionality was good, with many inputs, digital programmable display and a heavy, high quality remote control.

--

I still have the Lehmann Black Cube Linear and use it primarily with the HD650 and K701. I think these two headphones are well-matched with the BCL. Similarly to the RSA Raptor, it is also a smooth and extremely pleasant sound.
 
Feb 2, 2007 at 8:10 AM Post #6 of 7
Thank you for the answer.

Did you compare it to other preamps ?

In fact I have near 350 € tu put on a pre, and already have aura elctronics so I thought I could stay in auras and try to catch a CA200.

If you know any other pre that is very good around those price, could you tell me ?

Thank you,
Regards
 
Oct 13, 2007 at 3:11 PM Post #7 of 7
can someone tell me the differences between Lehmann BCL and Corda HA-2 MKII? which is better?
what about BCL vs. Earmax Pro?
thanks. any new info about BCL is welcome.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top