ch1525i
100+ Head-Fier
I, for one, am interested in your findings/impressions as I am considering both the Hugo 2 and uDAC now.I should know tomorrow as I have one arriving from Elise Audio![]()
I, for one, am interested in your findings/impressions as I am considering both the Hugo 2 and uDAC now.I should know tomorrow as I have one arriving from Elise Audio![]()
If you previously like May you wont be disappointed.I should know tomorrow as I have one arriving from Elise Audio![]()
I think I'm going to miss the Rose 180.....I ended up selling because I didn't need the volume control, EQ and phono functions. Oh, the Laiv version...I can't tell as I've never heard the Hugo. There should be some reviewer that compared them. I do know that the Harmony sounds like an R2R, without the tizz on top but still detailed.
Trying one out of course is the best way to hear. You do need to give it a good amount of burn in time to get a fair comparison.
Taking one for the team as it were.
As info about the GanM is coming out, for those who find the price prohibitive, I've now seen an announcement for the test of the SMSL VMV A1 pro GaNFET mono's. It's in German however. But I'll keep you posted.
I suspect he believes it's literary style, but it's just obtuse verbosity.Does anyone else have the same angst reading through Srajan's reviews. This is regarding the GaN monos. What a fatiguing read....
There’s the odd pearl in there but he makes you work for em, in my case in the wee hours squinting at the non-resizable tiny font on my iPad (he has a text copying resistant format). Should have saved it till after my morning espresso. Or three. The pearl for me was a comparison to Pass Class A which I have, and like, in my system, though even that was a little ambiguous as the different Pass models he’s reviewed are themselves spread along something of a continuum of more resolving/controlled/dynamic to warm/forgiving, with lushness/body a third axis, or point on the prism if you like. I have the XA25 which he previously likened to a more muscular Enleum 23R. Was he referring this, his old XA30.8 and/or the First Watts he keeps around when putting the GaNM on a spectrum between em and his Kinkis. The latter two Pass I’d wager. So where does that leave my XA25? Perhaps a candidate for a question to his ‘letters’ section, where to give credit where it’s due, Srajan seems very good at responding. All this focusing on pure sonics needless to say, the GaNMs winning vs Class A on efficiency, compactness, weight, cool runnings.Does anyone else have the same angst reading through Srajan's reviews. This is regarding the GaN monos. What a fatiguing read....
I suspect you think British English is the same as American English? It is not.I suspect he believes it's literary style, but it's just obtuse verbosity.
Really?I would like to see FR for different loads for the amp.
I wonder if it has PFFB
I think its fair to a point, but really all we need is someone to hook up some Maggie'sReally?
Maybe you should quickly hop over to ASR. See if he already broke one of these. Who is ever going to need more than 400W in 4Ω other than for dynamic headroom. Or badly designed speakers.
What's more important, it doesn't have negative feedback. Which usually dulls the sound (and why this sounds closer to tubes than class AB).
This one is made for musical pleasure, not for arguing about useless measurements.
I have two almost identical class-D amps, one with and one without PFFB. I prefer the one without. Maybe because I designed my speakers properly.
But I was about to view Sandu's review...
All my amps can drive my Maggie's 0.7 without a hitch. Except the tubeamps.I think its fair to a point, but really all we need is someone to hook up some Maggie'sshouldn't be wild variance between 4-6-8 Ohm speakers.
Whats wrong with load independent FR?Really?
Maybe you should quickly hop over to ASR. See if he already broke one of these. Who is ever going to need more than 400W in 4Ω other than for dynamic headroom. Or badly designed speakers.
What's more important, it doesn't have negative feedback. Which usually dulls the sound (and why this sounds closer to tubes than class AB).
This one is made for musical pleasure, not for arguing about useless measurements.
I have two almost identical class-D amps, one with and one without PFFB. I prefer the one without. Maybe because I designed my speakers properly.
But I was about to view Sandu's review...