oicdn
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Posts
- 3,381
- Likes
- 11
Quote:
There's a fine line though. The models you listed they did share ideas, they also exchanged quality control reports and budgeting after the fact. Even though GM fell on thier face and still do to this day on quality control, they share many things Toyota does today. I think where it lies is, they share the ideas and concepts on the design table, and on paper, but when it comes to actually producing/production models, each company puts thier own into it, whether it be cost cutting, or a remodel of a specific part that's where I think the two seperate at an alarming rate. on paper though, the two companies function pretty closely...
When my buddy was testing out the now Cobalt platformed Supercharger, there were various minglings with both design teams and "tricks of the trade" that were swapped and seen on later models. They may not be the same company, but they do communicate together. Very closely I may add. Toyota designers had a hand with the Ecotec IIRC...
I haven't been in the car ring for quite some time now, but I can't imagine much changing between the two companies...GM just really sucks at everything other than the Corvette. The failed miserably at the sport compact market and the F-Body was just neglected, and now defunct. Now they're gonna have to "creatively" figure a way to conjure up a way to reinvent a legend. It's like every other dept is lacking with maybe the exception of thier trucks.
Blah...I feel like that explanation was all over the place cause I'm on my way out to dinner....
Originally Posted by marvin /img/forum/go_quote.gif Re: Toyota and GM. Toyota has had partnerships with GM, but they're not even close to the same company. Aside from a few shared models (Cavalier/Cavalier, Matrix/Vibe, Corolla/Prizm) and some technology exchange, there's little to no intermixing in the companies lines. GM's cars were crap because, well, they were. Poor build quality and severe cost cutting measures plagued GM's designs. Toyota did not have the same problems. As for Yamaha's work, in the not too distant past, Toyota really sucked at designing motors. They were far behind the performance curve, so they hired Yamaha to design their high performance motors for them. |
There's a fine line though. The models you listed they did share ideas, they also exchanged quality control reports and budgeting after the fact. Even though GM fell on thier face and still do to this day on quality control, they share many things Toyota does today. I think where it lies is, they share the ideas and concepts on the design table, and on paper, but when it comes to actually producing/production models, each company puts thier own into it, whether it be cost cutting, or a remodel of a specific part that's where I think the two seperate at an alarming rate. on paper though, the two companies function pretty closely...
When my buddy was testing out the now Cobalt platformed Supercharger, there were various minglings with both design teams and "tricks of the trade" that were swapped and seen on later models. They may not be the same company, but they do communicate together. Very closely I may add. Toyota designers had a hand with the Ecotec IIRC...
I haven't been in the car ring for quite some time now, but I can't imagine much changing between the two companies...GM just really sucks at everything other than the Corvette. The failed miserably at the sport compact market and the F-Body was just neglected, and now defunct. Now they're gonna have to "creatively" figure a way to conjure up a way to reinvent a legend. It's like every other dept is lacking with maybe the exception of thier trucks.
Blah...I feel like that explanation was all over the place cause I'm on my way out to dinner....