- Joined
- Nov 8, 2004
- Posts
- 1,723
- Likes
- 221
I'm still pretty new to the headphone world, at least I'd think so, with having the K701 for only about a month and a half, and the CD3000 only for a few days, but I wanted to share my impressions of both headphones, since I've been listening a lot to the CD3000 at least during the last few days.
The K701 is very well burnt in with about 400+ hours, and the CD3000 had a previous owner, but they where his secondary pair.
I'm using the Bel Canto DAC 2 as source, not one of the best, but a very decent one imho, with the Denon DVD-2910 as transport, and the Corda Aria as my headphone amplifier.
Do note that this won't be a very well structured review, as often seen on this website, I'll just write as much information down as I can, since I also lack the necessary vocabulary in order to share what I'm hearing.
I listen to a huge variety of genres: Metal, Rock, Classical, Jazz, some Electronic and Soundtracks in general. I'll only mention a few though.
- Rock/Metal
K701: This certainly is a headphone that can handle these genres. However with bands like Metallica or Slayer there is something that is missing, the necessary "punch" so to say. I can't really get involved with this headphone like I can with the HF-1 for instance, which is a rather "fun" headphone and which actually allows you to really feel this type of music with most tracks. I'd say that the K701 is too neutral here at times, it lacks a tad bit on the lower end, a very deciding bit for me, especially compared to the CD3000. The great soundstage is an advantage with progressive rock here, Dream Theater or Pink Floyd come to mind, also Tool has a lot of fitting tracks.
CD3000: Even though the CD3000 is supposed to have an enormous soundstage, which it has, the presentation of rock seems so darn close! It allows you to really enjoy that kind of music. The impact that I need is finally there, this can is most definately a very fun one, even though you wouldn't think it, and I don't mean fun in the way that I used it with the HF-1, but fun as in "I can finally rock to my rock", serious business
. It also has a much fuller bass, which only contributes to its other brilliant qualities, like the incredible amount of detail it reveals and its great speed. Dream Theater's Train of Thought never sounded so darned good. And Tool's new album was practically made for this set of cans, IMO. It's really amazing how well it does what it does.
- Electronic (mainly Daft Punk and some tracks from Soundtracks)
K701: Again a very solid presentation, but again it misses something. This kind of music (at least the stuff I have) loves to use its bass. And the K701 doesn't love to use its bass, as it would seem to me. After some hundreds of hours of burn-in it seems to develop a very tight bass over time, but this is just not enough for me, and I am by no means basshungry, or however you want to call it. Don't get me wrong, I certainly appreciate it with other genres, but in this case and in the previous case of rock it just doesn't do. The highs and the midrange is pretty decent nevertheless with this one.
CD3000: I'd say that the highs are better here, as are the lows of course, great bass, and the mids are pretty much as sweet as they are on the K701. Again you can really hear the extremely great variety of details that it shows, a tad more revealing than the K701, but nothing night and day in this case.
- Jazz
K701: Very good Jazz headphones IMO, as the instrument seperation is outstanding, and the representation of the various instruments, especially on my Bill Evans records, is amazing. The bass is really fitting here, really tight and compact. The piano sounds really natural, the drums sound like they should as well, I can't really complain here. It would be a headphone of choice for Jazz easily. Great soundstage as well of course. Very open and airy sounding. I do not encounter issues of sibilance with my vocal jazz records, Diana Krall for instance.
CD3000: I also like the CD3k's approach, but in a different way. It doesn't sound as open (probably because it's a closed design
), but it has more lower end. It also sounds very natural, has great imaging (if you call it that way?) and seems to exhibit better highs again. I somehow prefer the mids of the K701 at times, while the CD3k still gives me a wonderful performance and I think that in this case it is a tie between both of them.
- Classical(orchestral music)
K701: Again, very nice representation of orchestras in general. I love listening to my various recordings of the 9th, and, to be perfectly honest, I never could enjoy them on those headphones, which made me think that I could never enjoy that kind of music on any heapdhone. It is not overwhelming enough, even though the soundstage does not lack, the instruments come out very well, and the mids are great. Not quite enough lower end again, but I don't really need this here. It must be the impact that speakers offer, that I missed, as well as the general approach with speakers (B&W 705) seemed to be more suitable.
CD3000: I did not think to be overwhelmed with this genre on these headphones as well, but I was surprised as how much of an impact these offer! The soundstage, which is larger than the K701, contributes to a very very nice experience. I'd still take a speaker over headphone for this kind of music any day, but if I'd have to take a headphone, I'd certainly go for the CD3k.
Conclusion(more or less):
So yes, I love the CD3k, and am really puzzled as to why Sony discontinued this model. Not only does it sound good, it's also closed and REALLY comfotable. I forget that it is on my head at times, which is a good sign. It may also be the combination of my source and amp which makes it as goodsounding to my ears as it is. I think that I might sell the K701, because this one offers everything I need. Both really are good all-arounders though.
Can't wait to pair it with a singlepower MPX3 SLAM, which I am planning to get. I also am thinking of modding it headphile style, with keeping it closed. But considering how great it sounds right now I am seriously questioning whether I should make any future upgrades at all, it is THAT good to me. And that really says something.
NOTE: Any spellingerrors or repetitions are due to my inferior intellect, and English is not my first language
.
The K701 is very well burnt in with about 400+ hours, and the CD3000 had a previous owner, but they where his secondary pair.
I'm using the Bel Canto DAC 2 as source, not one of the best, but a very decent one imho, with the Denon DVD-2910 as transport, and the Corda Aria as my headphone amplifier.
Do note that this won't be a very well structured review, as often seen on this website, I'll just write as much information down as I can, since I also lack the necessary vocabulary in order to share what I'm hearing.
I listen to a huge variety of genres: Metal, Rock, Classical, Jazz, some Electronic and Soundtracks in general. I'll only mention a few though.
- Rock/Metal
K701: This certainly is a headphone that can handle these genres. However with bands like Metallica or Slayer there is something that is missing, the necessary "punch" so to say. I can't really get involved with this headphone like I can with the HF-1 for instance, which is a rather "fun" headphone and which actually allows you to really feel this type of music with most tracks. I'd say that the K701 is too neutral here at times, it lacks a tad bit on the lower end, a very deciding bit for me, especially compared to the CD3000. The great soundstage is an advantage with progressive rock here, Dream Theater or Pink Floyd come to mind, also Tool has a lot of fitting tracks.
CD3000: Even though the CD3000 is supposed to have an enormous soundstage, which it has, the presentation of rock seems so darn close! It allows you to really enjoy that kind of music. The impact that I need is finally there, this can is most definately a very fun one, even though you wouldn't think it, and I don't mean fun in the way that I used it with the HF-1, but fun as in "I can finally rock to my rock", serious business
- Electronic (mainly Daft Punk and some tracks from Soundtracks)
K701: Again a very solid presentation, but again it misses something. This kind of music (at least the stuff I have) loves to use its bass. And the K701 doesn't love to use its bass, as it would seem to me. After some hundreds of hours of burn-in it seems to develop a very tight bass over time, but this is just not enough for me, and I am by no means basshungry, or however you want to call it. Don't get me wrong, I certainly appreciate it with other genres, but in this case and in the previous case of rock it just doesn't do. The highs and the midrange is pretty decent nevertheless with this one.
CD3000: I'd say that the highs are better here, as are the lows of course, great bass, and the mids are pretty much as sweet as they are on the K701. Again you can really hear the extremely great variety of details that it shows, a tad more revealing than the K701, but nothing night and day in this case.
- Jazz
K701: Very good Jazz headphones IMO, as the instrument seperation is outstanding, and the representation of the various instruments, especially on my Bill Evans records, is amazing. The bass is really fitting here, really tight and compact. The piano sounds really natural, the drums sound like they should as well, I can't really complain here. It would be a headphone of choice for Jazz easily. Great soundstage as well of course. Very open and airy sounding. I do not encounter issues of sibilance with my vocal jazz records, Diana Krall for instance.
CD3000: I also like the CD3k's approach, but in a different way. It doesn't sound as open (probably because it's a closed design
- Classical(orchestral music)
K701: Again, very nice representation of orchestras in general. I love listening to my various recordings of the 9th, and, to be perfectly honest, I never could enjoy them on those headphones, which made me think that I could never enjoy that kind of music on any heapdhone. It is not overwhelming enough, even though the soundstage does not lack, the instruments come out very well, and the mids are great. Not quite enough lower end again, but I don't really need this here. It must be the impact that speakers offer, that I missed, as well as the general approach with speakers (B&W 705) seemed to be more suitable.
CD3000: I did not think to be overwhelmed with this genre on these headphones as well, but I was surprised as how much of an impact these offer! The soundstage, which is larger than the K701, contributes to a very very nice experience. I'd still take a speaker over headphone for this kind of music any day, but if I'd have to take a headphone, I'd certainly go for the CD3k.
Conclusion(more or less):
So yes, I love the CD3k, and am really puzzled as to why Sony discontinued this model. Not only does it sound good, it's also closed and REALLY comfotable. I forget that it is on my head at times, which is a good sign. It may also be the combination of my source and amp which makes it as goodsounding to my ears as it is. I think that I might sell the K701, because this one offers everything I need. Both really are good all-arounders though.
Can't wait to pair it with a singlepower MPX3 SLAM, which I am planning to get. I also am thinking of modding it headphile style, with keeping it closed. But considering how great it sounds right now I am seriously questioning whether I should make any future upgrades at all, it is THAT good to me. And that really says something.
NOTE: Any spellingerrors or repetitions are due to my inferior intellect, and English is not my first language