fewtch
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2003
- Posts
- 9,559
- Likes
- 38
Quote:
I'd say the K501 is almost a diametric opposite from the K240S... with an illusion like the sound is coming from many yards away (well, with classical anyway). I'd say it isn't a very natural sounding headphone at all, but it's amazingly coherent throughout the spectrum, which goes a long way toward making up for its faults IMO. Nice and detailed while avoiding analytical tendencies as well. Just beef up the bass response a bit and I'd easily choose it as my main headphone for everything, at least for non-critical listening (I do have this sickness of liking to listen analytically from time to time
).
Originally Posted by spaceconvoy Inches might as well be feet as far as I'm concerned. One of the (many) reasons I didn't like the K240s is because the sound came from ~3 inches away from my head. It was so tangible you could measure it, and it was really distracting and unnatural. For me, the best soundstage I've heard was my A900LTD. There was definite space between the instuments, but it was still inside your head, like you were in the middle of the action. So it sounds like I'd hate the K501, but I'm still holding out hope for the K701. |
I'd say the K501 is almost a diametric opposite from the K240S... with an illusion like the sound is coming from many yards away (well, with classical anyway). I'd say it isn't a very natural sounding headphone at all, but it's amazingly coherent throughout the spectrum, which goes a long way toward making up for its faults IMO. Nice and detailed while avoiding analytical tendencies as well. Just beef up the bass response a bit and I'd easily choose it as my main headphone for everything, at least for non-critical listening (I do have this sickness of liking to listen analytically from time to time
