sigsegv0x0B
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 8, 2007
- Posts
- 263
- Likes
- 11
Quote:
As far as Shure E4c, ER4P/S, Super.Fi 5 Pro, H/K EP720 the HA-FX66 do not even come close to their sound in any category. On the other hand the FX66 cost $30 dollars and any of the IEMs I listed cost a lot more except the EP720 which is about 80 and is far far better then FX66 but the EP720 (and IM616) both suffer stupid design. I.e. they're not as convenient as the FX66 and have horrible microphonic cable. If you can spare the extra money to go for ER6i/EP720/IM616 you should as long as you can live with the comfort trade offs.
Originally Posted by robojack /img/forum/go_quote.gif Well, since mostly everyone's praising these new canalphones, let's get critical. How do these measure up (SQ and isolation-wise)with more expensive IEMs, such as Super.fi 5 Pros, Q-jays, Atrios M5, Westone EM2, etc? |
As far as Shure E4c, ER4P/S, Super.Fi 5 Pro, H/K EP720 the HA-FX66 do not even come close to their sound in any category. On the other hand the FX66 cost $30 dollars and any of the IEMs I listed cost a lot more except the EP720 which is about 80 and is far far better then FX66 but the EP720 (and IM616) both suffer stupid design. I.e. they're not as convenient as the FX66 and have horrible microphonic cable. If you can spare the extra money to go for ER6i/EP720/IM616 you should as long as you can live with the comfort trade offs.