blackreplica
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2004
- Posts
- 237
- Likes
- 1
I am a previous e2c user and just got my um2s in the mail from the ebay seller i'm sure you guys know about.
Its funny that the um2s are advertised as having opened packaging but arrived brand new in plastic shrink wrap. maybe its a way of avoiding westone clamping down on his cheap prices?
anyway i've been listening to these phones for about 20 minutes. First things first, the packaging is awesome. The comply tips are excellent, provide fantastic isolation, much better than the regular shure foamies, and are supremely comfortable. Much better than the e2c foam tips if thats any comparison
First impressions of the sound as follows: When i first put them in, i played some music, and thought to myself, hmmm...not bad, but doesnt seem *that* much better than my e2c. So i put my e2cs back in my ear(havent listened to them since 2 days ago), and realised, after a nearly a year of using them, how muddy and veiled they actually sounded. OMG! 30 seconds later the UM2s were back in my ear (with the small tips this time, and i preferred them, they fit better and gave me just as much isolation as the large tips i used at first). Then i played some more music, tried a few different genres, and realised how good these damn things were.
I would characterise the sound as very shure-like. The midrange is very forward(surprising i found this since people say the um2s are actually more balanced). Very in-your-face and involving voices. Overall sound: warm, in a good way. Bass is very, very good. it goes amazingly deep and is damn clean doing it. i wouldnt go so far as to say that you can 'feel' the bass, except for select types of music, but i have no doubt that this is as good as it gets with canalphones. More than i expected a canalphone as capable of doing. I detected some sibilance at the beginning, and then realised i had my treble boost on (for my e2cs)...doh! turned the treble boost down from +6 to +2 and the sibilance is gone. Even at reduced treble boost, there is more upper end detail on the UM2s. Its just the right amount, i hear the sounds i am supposed to hear, and yet its not fatiguing in any way.
I dont suppose its a fair comparison, but compared to my e2c, there is also a lack of congestion all around. soundstage seems a little more spacious, and the layering of individual instruments are clearly superior. the e2cs just mush everything together compared with the um2s.
I am expecting the triflange tips in the mail later today or tomorrow. i have never used tri-flanges before, having restricted myself to foamies because i expect them to be much more comfortable and provide better isolation. i could be wrong though, anyway i'll soond find out if i'm right or not.
Last thing to note, these phones are ridiculously easy to drive. I only need to run at volume 11 on my iriver ihp-h140 now, when i needed to run at 15-16 before to get the same SPL on my e2cs
Closing line? Clearly superior to the e2c (duh!). I'm not sure if its 200USD better though, the jury is still out on that. i am impressed, but i was expecting to me *more* impressed (if that makes any sense at all). But the phones are still new, and i will need to get used to them before i make any firm judgement one way or another.
Happy to take questions or comments!
Its funny that the um2s are advertised as having opened packaging but arrived brand new in plastic shrink wrap. maybe its a way of avoiding westone clamping down on his cheap prices?
anyway i've been listening to these phones for about 20 minutes. First things first, the packaging is awesome. The comply tips are excellent, provide fantastic isolation, much better than the regular shure foamies, and are supremely comfortable. Much better than the e2c foam tips if thats any comparison
First impressions of the sound as follows: When i first put them in, i played some music, and thought to myself, hmmm...not bad, but doesnt seem *that* much better than my e2c. So i put my e2cs back in my ear(havent listened to them since 2 days ago), and realised, after a nearly a year of using them, how muddy and veiled they actually sounded. OMG! 30 seconds later the UM2s were back in my ear (with the small tips this time, and i preferred them, they fit better and gave me just as much isolation as the large tips i used at first). Then i played some more music, tried a few different genres, and realised how good these damn things were.
I would characterise the sound as very shure-like. The midrange is very forward(surprising i found this since people say the um2s are actually more balanced). Very in-your-face and involving voices. Overall sound: warm, in a good way. Bass is very, very good. it goes amazingly deep and is damn clean doing it. i wouldnt go so far as to say that you can 'feel' the bass, except for select types of music, but i have no doubt that this is as good as it gets with canalphones. More than i expected a canalphone as capable of doing. I detected some sibilance at the beginning, and then realised i had my treble boost on (for my e2cs)...doh! turned the treble boost down from +6 to +2 and the sibilance is gone. Even at reduced treble boost, there is more upper end detail on the UM2s. Its just the right amount, i hear the sounds i am supposed to hear, and yet its not fatiguing in any way.
I dont suppose its a fair comparison, but compared to my e2c, there is also a lack of congestion all around. soundstage seems a little more spacious, and the layering of individual instruments are clearly superior. the e2cs just mush everything together compared with the um2s.
I am expecting the triflange tips in the mail later today or tomorrow. i have never used tri-flanges before, having restricted myself to foamies because i expect them to be much more comfortable and provide better isolation. i could be wrong though, anyway i'll soond find out if i'm right or not.
Last thing to note, these phones are ridiculously easy to drive. I only need to run at volume 11 on my iriver ihp-h140 now, when i needed to run at 15-16 before to get the same SPL on my e2cs
Closing line? Clearly superior to the e2c (duh!). I'm not sure if its 200USD better though, the jury is still out on that. i am impressed, but i was expecting to me *more* impressed (if that makes any sense at all). But the phones are still new, and i will need to get used to them before i make any firm judgement one way or another.
Happy to take questions or comments!