hardstyler
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2006
- Posts
- 708
- Likes
- 10
Quote:
If he EQ in the -ve only he would have to raise the volume up. In the end he would end up with same result. Or am I wrong? Here is an example with shots from foobar2000 EQ.
Pic 1 -ve Here I have to turn the volume up.
![](http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/7330/pic1mp2.jpg)
Pic 2 +ve Volume stays at 55% (my normal listening level)
![](http://img488.imageshack.us/img488/2434/pic2ir3.jpg)
Can someone give me a real explanation of why EQ in the - is better because I don't get it.
Originally Posted by jilgiljongiljing /img/forum/go_quote.gif bass and treble at 50% above 0db? remember not to EQ in the +ve, always EQ in the -ve. Reduce the mids if you want more bass and treble and leave those at 0db. And trust me, if you come to a conclusion that these headphones are no good with an Xfi card with CMSS and EQ and EAX for listening to music, that is not being fair to the headphones. |
If he EQ in the -ve only he would have to raise the volume up. In the end he would end up with same result. Or am I wrong? Here is an example with shots from foobar2000 EQ.
Pic 1 -ve Here I have to turn the volume up.
![](http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/7330/pic1mp2.jpg)
Pic 2 +ve Volume stays at 55% (my normal listening level)
![](http://img488.imageshack.us/img488/2434/pic2ir3.jpg)
Can someone give me a real explanation of why EQ in the - is better because I don't get it.