rumatt
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2006
- Posts
- 447
- Likes
- 11
Quote:
I don't know whether I can hear the difference between FLAC and 320K MP3. And at 10 cents of HD space per CD, I couldn't care less. I'm going with FLAC because there is absolutely no reason not to.
Quote:
Exactly. This is enough reason right here.
Originally Posted by Aman /img/forum/go_quote.gif FLAC is scientifically not worth the hard disk space, if your only goal in encoding to this format is to listen. |
I don't know whether I can hear the difference between FLAC and 320K MP3. And at 10 cents of HD space per CD, I couldn't care less. I'm going with FLAC because there is absolutely no reason not to.
Quote:
On the other hand, if you're planning on also keeping an archive of your CDs, or want to be able to convert to any other format on the fly, then I'd say go for it. |
Exactly. This is enough reason right here.