skamp
Aka: HeadFiend, BatFi
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2008
- Posts
- 1,334
- Likes
- 94
There's no such thing as "more transparent", as far as audibility is concerned. It's either audibly transparent, or it's not. There is no point in spending more money on gear that measures well beyond audibility (e.g. the $1,500 Benchmark DAC1, used as a reference by NwAvGuy), if all you're going to do is listening to music. And a fair point could be made that spending $250 on the O2/ODAC is already kinda excessive, unless you have very specific needs that aren't all met by cheaper gear (like the FiiO E7, for instance).
Personally, I justify my purchase like this:
1) My FiiO E7 started having contact issues on the headphone jacks after only a couple of months of use. I wanted something with much better build quality.
2) I wanted a good amp with near 0Ω output impedance, so that it would work with headphones / IEMs with a non-flat impedance curve (like my Shure SE425s).
3) I wanted an amp that could power headphones with very low sensitivity, should I ever buy a pair.
4) I wanted an amp with enough headroom, power wise, because I use a lot of digital attenuation to the signal (Replaygain, subtractive EQ).
5) I wanted overkill, for the warm fuzzy feeling, and peace of mind.
I'm not saying it's 100% justified
Personally, I justify my purchase like this:
1) My FiiO E7 started having contact issues on the headphone jacks after only a couple of months of use. I wanted something with much better build quality.
2) I wanted a good amp with near 0Ω output impedance, so that it would work with headphones / IEMs with a non-flat impedance curve (like my Shure SE425s).
3) I wanted an amp that could power headphones with very low sensitivity, should I ever buy a pair.
4) I wanted an amp with enough headroom, power wise, because I use a lot of digital attenuation to the signal (Replaygain, subtractive EQ).
5) I wanted overkill, for the warm fuzzy feeling, and peace of mind.
I'm not saying it's 100% justified