userlander
Banned - aka walrus1 - aka vidranger1 - aka iggy-starnuts
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Posts
- 1,745
- Likes
- 12
He makes some good points on AC power, imho.
Originally Posted by nealric /img/forum/go_quote.gif His comments on the post are pretty ridiculous. I kind wonder if the whole thing was an elaborate flame. |
Originally Posted by grokit /img/forum/go_quote.gif [snip] Setting up the QB-9 in my main system wasn't as plug'n'play as I'd envisioned. Details mattered—maxing out the RAM on my G4 iBook made a huge difference to the sound, as did matching the sample rates on the computer and DAC." IMHO, the DAC is equally as important as the source recording and resolution, the amplification, and the speakers/headphones; also DAC technology is obviously still evolving. |
Originally Posted by evanft /img/forum/go_quote.gif Most DBT I've seen with DAC's concluded that they sound very, very similar, often indistinguishable from each other. Of course, this assumes ideal conditions with the bitstream being fed to it. |
Originally Posted by b0dhi /img/forum/go_quote.gif About the RAM comment though, all I can say is I'm an open-minded guy but that reviewer was just hearing what they wanted to hear. The whole point of slaving the PC to the DAC is so that timing errors on the PC don't have any effect on the DAC. |
Originally Posted by Shike /img/forum/go_quote.gif [T]here's still people out there that think their monitor is their computer… |
Originally Posted by grokit You have to keep in mind that the reviewer was using an iBook G4, which maxed out at 1.5gB of RAM, if you had the very best version, and came stock with 512mB if you were lucky; he disclosed it |
Originally Posted by DSGant /img/forum/go_quote.gif My monitor is my computer! |
Originally Posted by Iniamyen /img/forum/go_quote.gif How is this a nightmare for these parties??? I don't know about you, but I like having lots of work. It means I get paid. |
Originally Posted by grokit /img/forum/go_quote.gif I was reading a review of the new high-end asynchronous USB DAC from Ayre, and evidently the weak link in the chain was the computer until the reviewer increased the RAM in it. In the context of what this thing actually goes through to re-clock the datastream, I can see why. Most USB DACs are entirely different than the QB-9, being adaptive rather than asynchronous, and therefore don't need proprietary coding: |
Originally Posted by Shark_Jump /img/forum/go_quote.gif I see asynchronous USB DAC was first mentioned on head fi a couple of years ago (Wavelength crimson). Was wandering how this technology is evolving. Does it make a difference to SQ? Which DAC's currently employ this technology? |
Originally Posted by EnOYiN /img/forum/go_quote.gif That's where I stopped reading. |