Internet explorer 7 rocks (beta version)
Feb 3, 2006 at 6:42 PM Post #3 of 23
Firefoxxx > IE.

4EVR.


>
frown.gif
 
Feb 3, 2006 at 6:45 PM Post #5 of 23
My firefox only has one x in the name, should I be worried?
 
Feb 3, 2006 at 6:58 PM Post #7 of 23
Quote:

Originally Posted by fishtankfish
/\

haha, is this guy serious? your argument defeats itself.




And yes, I was seriously arguing there.
I'm just clearly partial to FireFox.
 
Feb 3, 2006 at 8:06 PM Post #10 of 23
If you like form submitals that crash, then firefox > u.

Biggie.
 
Feb 3, 2006 at 8:17 PM Post #11 of 23
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kixyll
If you enjoy a browser with absolutely horrid memory leaks, then Firefox > all. Supposedly 1.5.1 will fix it, although they said the same about 1.5.


I agree. The Firefox team needs to address memory leaks fully before moving on to further development. It's a good browser; I just feel there is much room for improvement when it comes to efficiency and stability. Firefox should be streamlined, not cumbersome.
 
Feb 3, 2006 at 8:28 PM Post #13 of 23
Not yet. After seeing 3 tabs put me over 300mb in 1.5 I uninstalled it in disgust. I'm liking the IE7 beta quite a bit, the quick tab view is awesome. Don't really see a reason to switch back to FF, even if they did fix the memory problems. FF was a great browser, but every release seems to become more and more bloated.
 
Feb 4, 2006 at 12:56 AM Post #15 of 23
Quote:

Originally Posted by ricardo diaz
Insanely.


Speaking of Firefox names, I used to be partial to the Firesomething extension; it was pretty novel for awhile. But it doesn't work with the newest version of Firefox for some reason :frowning2:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top