[rickcr42]

http://bwcecom.belden.com/college/te...oss%202004.pdf

 

[Glod]

Interesting reading indeed. I always read these kind of papers with interest, but, I usually only partially manage to grasp the content.

Being a non-electronics engineer, I cannot help asking my self every time: but what does it sound like; how does it interpret into a subjective Hi-Fi audio perception?

Technology should have a prominent place in the Hi-fi debate IMO, but in the end the proof of the pudding...

 

[rickcr42]

Quote:

Technology should have a prominent place in the Hi-fi debate IMO, but in the end the proof of the pudding...

always the last word anyway but a litle bit of "over the head" tech is a nice kick in the a*s from time to time.

 

[bigshot]

The best of all is to know what it sounds like, AND understand why. Technical stuff sometimes makes it difficult to determine how much of a difference something makes. A meter can measure things that we as lowly humans will never be able to detect. It's nice to put your effort into maximizing things that you *can* hear, rather than things you can't.

See ya
Steve