Shang-Ti Chen
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2003
- Posts
- 781
- Likes
- 10
As title... which of them has the most details and what is the order if arranged from the most to the least detailed? Thanks.
Originally posted by zcx THis is a funny question~ in any case, detail is one important part of the sound, but it is not ALL. In my mind, I prefer R10~ because it find the best way to show the details and at the same time it doesn't cause listening-tired. |
Originally posted by markl Haven't heard the L3000, but if i were to rank the others from MOST---->LEAST: R10------------>W2002---------------------------------------------->RS-1 |
Originally posted by Shang-Ti Chen As title... which of them has the most details and what is the order if arranged from the most to the least detailed? Thanks. |
Wow... Does W2002 really truly have more details than RS-1? Does the length of the ¡Ð¡Ö mean the difference of amount of detail? If put in Omega II and ER-4S, how will the order be? |
Depends which part of the frequency spectrum you are looking for detail in. |
Originally posted by Beagle Depends which part of the frequency spectrum you are looking for detail in. If you want natural detail across the spectrum as you would hear real live musical instruments, try the RS-1. If you want details for details sake, try the others. |
Originally posted by markl These are all such radically different phones you're contemplating here. IMO, there's much more to a headphone than just "detail", there's tone & timbre, soundstaging, frequency balance, imaging, musicality, etc. etc. You can find the most detailed headphone to your ears, but it comes up so short in other areas for you, that it just doesn't sound "right" for you. You really need to try as many of these as you can to find to hear for yourself. |
Originally posted by Chefguru Any more detail then the r10 is just stupid. |