DefectiveAudioComponent
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2008
- Posts
- 3,030
- Likes
- 128
I just bought a vintage Toshiba HR-X1 complementary back electret headphone. (although it doesn't say complementary electret on it, that's supposedly what's there.)
It's very light and comfortable. Although, the sound is light too. What's there sounds good at a first listen, but the lower bass is absent. Like the pleather on the pads. It's no worse though than some of the low-bass orthodynamic headphones I have - before modifications to restore the bass. (I have no idea (yet) if any of them would work on the X1.). I'm taking the pads apart to replace the ruined pleather. I don't want the small pieces of crumbling pleather inside the drivers. I managed to get two small pieces out without destroying the drivers.
There is no damping inside.
The label on the headband is not exactly like the Aurex line of headphones.
This is mine:
and this was posted in a japanese site:
I don't know if it's the same headphone. But it sure looks extremely similar.
It uses a somewhat mysterious "complementary back electret" principle (mysterious to me, since I can't read this explanation in Japanese (?).)
It's very light and comfortable. Although, the sound is light too. What's there sounds good at a first listen, but the lower bass is absent. Like the pleather on the pads. It's no worse though than some of the low-bass orthodynamic headphones I have - before modifications to restore the bass. (I have no idea (yet) if any of them would work on the X1.). I'm taking the pads apart to replace the ruined pleather. I don't want the small pieces of crumbling pleather inside the drivers. I managed to get two small pieces out without destroying the drivers.
There is no damping inside.
The label on the headband is not exactly like the Aurex line of headphones.
This is mine:
and this was posted in a japanese site:
I don't know if it's the same headphone. But it sure looks extremely similar.
It uses a somewhat mysterious "complementary back electret" principle (mysterious to me, since I can't read this explanation in Japanese (?).)