iFi micro iDSD Black-Label - In-Depth Review
Feb 6, 2017 at 4:33 PM Post #16 of 1,056
It would be interesting to see the measurements for BL versus Mojo with CD quality music (44,1 kHz 16 bit) as most music is in this format. Also it would be great to see the measurements with a load (headphone) attached.
Strange that the Mojo shows as much pre and post ringing as standard filter on BL as transients can be heard very well on Mojo. Also the Mojo appears to have more treble roll off than BL even on bit perfect filter (judging from hearing). This hearing impression from Mojo does not really correspond to a sharp roll off filter. Don't know whether that is due to the amp section or the filter.
 
Feb 9, 2017 at 6:53 PM Post #17 of 1,056
This might be the stupidest question.  But does the BL version still comes with a black bag?  I always put that bag on my silver version so technically it looks BL.  I am surprised that the picture of accessories doesn't including that bag which can make the BL version matters more.
 
Feb 10, 2017 at 10:06 AM Post #18 of 1,056
It would be interesting to see the measurements for BL versus Mojo with CD quality music (44,1 kHz 16 bit) as most music is in this format. Also it would be great to see the measurements with a load (headphone) attached.
Strange that the Mojo shows as much pre and post ringing as standard filter on BL as transients can be heard very well on Mojo. Also the Mojo appears to have more treble roll off than BL even on bit perfect filter (judging from hearing). This hearing impression from Mojo does not really correspond to a sharp roll off filter. Don't know whether that is due to the amp section or the filter.

 
Agree, will measure 44,1 kHz 16 bit later when have time, currently very busy. Probably due too the unique fpga DAC in Mojo, it does sound quite different than other DACs.
 
 
  This might be the stupidest question.  But does the BL version still comes with a black bag?  I always put that bag on my silver version so technically it looks BL.  I am surprised that the picture of accessories doesn't including that bag which can make the BL version matters more.

 
Yes it does come with the soft pouch. Sorry I overlooked the pouch when I took the picture.
 
Mar 7, 2017 at 2:21 PM Post #21 of 1,056
I am still wondering does the standard(older) iDSD have the same delay when using the USB connection with a computer playing say Foobar 2000 or playing videos from You Tube? I would like to hear if this delay will be fixed with a future firmware update? 
 
I really like the looks and specfications of this unit. But my less expensive Micca OriGen USB audio DAC doesn't have any delay in playing music or videos. I plan on using this as desktop setup with my windows computer at home. 
 
Would you buy the iDSD Black or the AUNE S6 or the most expensive desktop of the 3 would be the JOTUNHEIM/BiFrost Multibit ? 
 
Thanks for the help.
 
Apr 5, 2017 at 12:00 PM Post #22 of 1,056
I'm a little confused by the oddly named gain settings combined with the IEMatch options. What would be the best configuration for a very low impedance, very sensitive multi-BA earphone like the Shure SE846?

Also, why is the high sensitivity setting at an output impedance of 4.1 ohm? That strikes me as very counter-intuitive.
 
Apr 5, 2017 at 1:20 PM Post #23 of 1,056
I'm a little confused by the oddly named gain settings combined with the IEMatch options. What would be the best configuration for a very low impedance, very sensitive multi-BA earphone like the Shure SE846?

Also, why is the high sensitivity setting at an output impedance of 4.1 ohm? That strikes me as very counter-intuitive.

 
Because it is not simply 'gain setting' but something more than that, proven by the different output impedance on different gain setting. 
High Sens or Ultra Sens should be fine for SE846.
No idea why 4.1 ohms, but from my experience less than 5 ohms output impedance practically has very little effect to most IEMs I've tried. And slightly higher output impedance sometime may reduce hiss noise a little bit.
 
Apr 5, 2017 at 1:23 PM Post #24 of 1,056
  I am still wondering does the standard(older) iDSD have the same delay when using the USB connection with a computer playing say Foobar 2000 or playing videos from You Tube? I would like to hear if this delay will be fixed with a future firmware update? 
 
I really like the looks and specfications of this unit. But my less expensive Micca OriGen USB audio DAC doesn't have any delay in playing music or videos. I plan on using this as desktop setup with my windows computer at home. 
 
Would you buy the iDSD Black or the AUNE S6 or the most expensive desktop of the 3 would be the JOTUNHEIM/BiFrost Multibit ? 
 
Thanks for the help.

 
I forgot to test the latency for video playback. Now I don't have the BL anymore, returned to iFi. One day I will try the silver iDSD for YouTube.
I like iDSD Black Label as it is, but no idea how it is compared to Aune S6. In comparison to Bifrost Multibit, I would probably choose the iDSD BL for the versatility.
 
Apr 5, 2017 at 1:39 PM Post #25 of 1,056
   
Because it is not simply 'gain setting' but something more than that, proven by the different output impedance on different gain setting. 
High Sens or Ultra Sens should be fine for SE846.
No idea why 4.1 ohms, but from my experience less than 5 ohms output impedance practically has very little effect to most IEMs I've tried. And slightly higher output impedance sometime may reduce hiss noise a little bit.

 
4.1 ohms, not .41 ohms? The impedance of the 846 varies with frequency betwen 5 and 16 ohms, 4.1 ohms output impedance would not be enough damping for any of that range. Frankly, output impedance above 1 ohm is very noticeable.
 
It sounds like IEMatch Ultra in Eco Mode would be the lowest V, lowest mA, lowest impedance way to go for multi-BAs. Seem right?
 
Apr 21, 2017 at 4:55 AM Post #26 of 1,056
  Features and Measurement

Disclaimer:
Measurement in this review was conducted for the purpose of general observation of the review unit, and not meant for comparison with the official specification from iFi. Test results may differ from the official specification due to many factors, mostly due to the different setup and measurement equipment. Therefore all test results posted in this review are not to be compared with another measurement result, and only useful for comparison between measurement in a similar setup.

RMAA measurement was used in some measurement as a convenient way to get frequency response graph. Although RMAA is a convenient way to check frequency response, RMAA is not a very reliable and accurate method to measure other parameters. So please read the measurement result with that consideration. HRT LineStreamer+ was used as the audio interface for all RMAA measurements.

The following is my standard settings on QuantAsylum QA401 (24-bit audio analyzer) for amplitude measurement:
FFT resolution: 32768 points
Averaging: 5
Sampling frequency: 48.0 kHz
Windowing: FlatTop
Weighting: None

SNR measurement uses similar setting as above but using different windowing and weighting setting:
Windowing: Hann
Weighting: A weighting

THD measurement setting is similar to amplitude measurement setting but with different windowing function:
Windowing: Hann

Unless otherwise specified, the settings above are currently my standard settings for amplitude measurements, SNR, and THD on QuantAsylum QA401.
 

 
 
 
Table of Features
 
 
Both the older version of iFi micro iDSD and the Black-Label version have similar features and specifications, therefore I listed only the Black-Label version in this table of features. 
Below is a table of features of iFi micro iDSD Black-Label in comparison with Chord Mojo. Voltage, current, and impedance indicated in this table are from my own measurement, and not from the official specification from the manufacturer. This review is based on firmware version 5.20.
 
Parameter
iFi micro iDSD Black-label
Chord Mojo
DAC
Dual-Core Burr-Brown (2-DAC Chip)​
Chord Custom FPGA DAC​
PCM
PCM 768/ 705.6/ 384/ 352.8/ 192/ 176.4/
96/ 88.2/ 48/ 44.1kHz​
PCM 768/ 705.6/ 384/ 352.8/ 192/ 176.4/
96/ 88.2/ 48/ 44.1kHz​
DSD
up to DSD 512​
up to DSD 256​
Multi-platform compatibility
Yes​
Yes​
USB Input
USB 2.0 type A “OTG” Socket
(with iPurifier® technology built-in)​
Micro-B USB​
SPDIF Coaxial Input
RCA - Up to 192kHz PCM​
3.5mm jack - Up to 768kHz PCM​
SPDIF Optical Input
Up to 192kHz PCM​
Up to 192kHz PCM​
SPDIF Output
RCA Coaxial - Up to 192kHz PCM​
-​
USB to SPDIF Conversion
Yes - Up to 192kHz PCM​
-​
Selectable Filter
Yes - 3 options for each PCM and DSD​
-​
Analog Line Input
Yes - 3.5mm socket​
-​
Analog Line Output
Yes - Dedicated RCA​
Integrated with headphone output​
Line Output Level
Direct: 2V Fixed
PreAmp - Eco: 0 - 2.18 V
Variable - Normal: 0 - 5.66 V
Variable - Turbo: 0 - 6.43 V​
0V - 4.79V Variable​
Headphone Output
1x 6.5mm socket​
2x 3.5mm socket​
Adjustable HO Gain
Yes - 9 combinations​
-​
Maximum HO Voltage -
measured @ 600 ohms load
9.71 Vrms​
4.79 Vrms​
Maximum HO Current -
measured @ 15 ohms load
306 mA​
199 mA​
HO Output Impedance
IEMatch Off: 0.34 ohms
IEMatch High Sensitivity: 4.1 ohms
IEMatch Ultra Sensitivity: 0.95 ohms​
0.44 ohms​
HO SNR @ 50 mV @ 33 ohms
(for very sensitive IEM)
Eco - Ultra Sens. : 87.3 dB
Normal - Ultra Sens. : 87.0 dB
Turbo - Ultra Sens. : 83.0 dB​
82.9 dB​
Volume Control
Analog Potentiometer​
Digital​
Extra Features
XBass Plus, 3D Matrix Plus, Polarity Switch,
& USB Power Bank (5V, 1.5A)​
-​
Weight
310g​
180g​
Dimension
177mm (l) x 67mm (w) x 28mm(h)​
82mm (l) x 60mm (w) x 22mm (h)​
 
 

USB Input with iFi iPurifier® technology
Here is some info from the iFi iPurifier® webpage:
http://ifi-audio.com/portfolio-view/accessory-ipurifier/
From the explanation above, the function of iFi iPurifier® with PurePurification® technology is to remove unwanted EMI from USB audio + power. Therefore I prepared a test to test it, in comparison with Chord Mojo that doesn’t advertise any special feature on its USB input. One thing I know from the measurement is, the USB ground of iFi micro iDSD BL is isolated from the analog output ground. Having some experience with ground loop and EMI on USB cable, isolation of the USB ground and the analog circuit ground is an important feature for any USB audio interface. Many of my USB DACs don’t isolate USB ground and the analog circuit ground, and sometimes I do hear EMI noise especially when there is cordless phone near the setup. Chord Mojo for example, it doesn’t isolate USB ground and the analog circuit ground, as shown in the picture below.

  
 

The EMI test setup is as the following:

 

The following video is the test, showing the effect of strong electromagnetic interference (EMI) on USB cable, and the effect of iFi iPurifier® technology isolating the USB ground and the analog circuit ground to stop EMI noise from transmitting from the digital domain to the analog domain. I did the test in 2 setups, while the DAC is idle and when the DAC is playing a silent track. The results are pretty close between the 2 setups.

Note: The overall noise has been double amplified to make it more audible on this video. In reality, the EMI noise is much softer, but audible on sensitive In-Ear Monitor.
 

 
It is always a good idea to use a short USB cable for USB DAC 
wink.gif


 
 

Multi-Platform Compatibility (OTG Feature)
I’ve only tested the iFi micro iDSD Black-Label using Windows PC and Android devices. It works well with my old Android smartphone, Samsung Galaxy S4 with USB Audio Player PRO (UAPP), also fully compatible with my Android based DAP, the Onkyo DP-X1.
 

 

An interesting note when using the iFi micro iDSD Black-Label with a smartphone is, that it will try to recharge while in Sleep Mode. That means when it is connected to a smartphone, and being idle for some time and goes into sleep mode, it might withdraw power from the smartphone to charge its battery. Meaning it will drain the smartphone battery. iFi has a special firmware to disable the sleep mode to prevent it draining the smartphone battery. If we often use it with mobile devices, it is a good idea to use that version of firmware. Here is the link to the firmware page:

http://ifi-audio.com/micro-idsd-ifi-xmos-firmware/
 


SPDIF Input and Output
The coaxial SPDIF switches automatically between input and output function. When iFi micro iDSD Black-Label is being used as USB DAC, the coaxial SPDIF functions as SPDIF output. Without USB audio signal applied, the SPDIF coaxial SPDIF input. The optical interface of the SPDIF only functions as input.

When USB input is used, iFi micro iDSD Black-Label functions as USB to SPDIF Converter. And the cool thing about this feature, it works even with the unit is powered off. The USB DAC and SPDIF output work using the power from the computer, therefore it doesn’t require for the unit to be turned on. The SPDIF works for all PCM sampling rates Up to 192kHz.


 
 

Digital and Analog Filters
The feature of selectable filters though probably a bit too technical for the majorities, it is definitely an interesting feature for audiophile enthusiasts. It is rather too lengthy to discuss about digital and analog filters in this review, so I will just show some spectrum analysis and the pre and post ringing of the filters to give a better idea of the characteristic of each filter. I used 750 Hz square wave (0.5 dBFS), measured from the RCA line output directly connected to the audio analyzer or oscilloscope. The line output switch was set to Direct. The reason for using square wave is because I could observe both harmonic frequencies and the pre-post ringing characteristic of the filters at the same time. I measured both iFi micro iDSD and iFi micro iDSD Black-Label. Both have a pretty similar response, therefore I will only post the result of the iFi micro iDSD Black-Label. Chord Mojo also measured for comparison. From the sound quality perspective, Minimum Phase is what I use most, and Bit Perfect next. Here is a post from iFi to find out more about the filters:

http://www.head-fi.org/t/711217/idsd-micro-black-label-tour-details-page-147-release-info-page-153/1050#post_10662147
 

PCM Playback - FFT Measurement

iFi micro iDSD Black-Label - Bit Perfect - 750 Hz Square Wave - 24bit / 96kHz PCM:

 
iFi micro iDSD Black-Label - Minimum Phase - 750 Hz Square Wave - 24bit / 96kHz PCM:

 
iFi micro iDSD Black-Label - Standard - 750 Hz Square Wave - 24bit / 96kHz PCM:

 
Chord Mojo- 750 Hz Square Wave - 24bit / 96kHz PCM:

 

The FFT analysis of the Chord Mojo output is quite interesting with the present of the even-integer harmonic frequencies, as the ideal square wave contains only components of odd-integer harmonic frequencies. The level of the even-integer harmonic frequencies from Chord Mojo output is very low, but still, it is an interesting observation as we can see that the output of iFi micro iDSD Black-Label is relatively free from the even-integer harmonic frequencies. Besides that, the roll-off frequency of Chord Mojo filter for PCM playback looks very sharp, much sharper than the micro iDSD standard filter. Both have a very different approach to the implementation of the low-pass filter.
 

PCM Playback - Pre and Post Ringing Characteristic
 
iFi micro iDSD Black-Label - Bit Perfect - 750 Hz Square Wave - 24bit / 96kHz PCM:

 

 
iFi micro iDSD Black-Label - Minimum Phase - 750 Hz Square Wave - 24bit / 96kHz PCM:

 

 
iFi micro iDSD Black-Label - Standard- 750 Hz Square Wave - 24bit / 96kHz PCM:

 

 
Chord Mojo- 750 Hz Square Wave - 24bit / 96kHz PCM:

 

 

Bit Perfect filter that essentially no low-pass filter, as expected, showing a good shape of Square Wave with only a tiny post ringing. The rest showing low to moderate pre and post ringing due to the high frequencies filtering. Chord Mojo output has the longest pre and post ringing, probably due to the sharp rolls-off filter.
 

RMAA Comparison Between the Digital Filters
Here is the summary of the RMAA measurement results between the 3 digital filters. Most interesting is the frequency response graph, to see the different steepness of the high-frequency roll-off.
 
Test
ifi micro iDSD BL Bit Perfect Nor-H HO 2V
ifi micro iDSD BL Min Phase Nor-H HO 2V
ifi micro iDSD BL Standard Nor-H HO 2V
Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB:
+0.58, +0.21​
+0.56, +0.53​
+0.00, -0.03​
Noise level, dB (A):
-91.1​
-91.3​
-91.4​
Dynamic range, dB (A):
90.9​
91.2​
91.2​
THD, %:
0.0041​
0.0043​
0.0042​
IMD + Noise, %:
0.029​
0.029​
0.029​
Stereo crosstalk, dB:
-83.1​
-84.0​
-83.9​

 

 
 

DSD Playback - FFT Measurement

I forgot to capture the DSD playback FFT measurement from the iFi micro iDSD Black-Label before I returned the unit, therefore the following it the FFT measurement of the iFi micro iDSD, which is similar to the Black-Label version.

iFi micro iDSD - Ultra-wide (Bit Perfect) - 750 Hz Square Wave - DSD128:

 
iFi micro iDSD - Extended (Minimum Phase) - 750 Hz Square Wave - DSD128:

 
iFi micro iDSD - Standard (Standard)- 750 Hz Square Wave - DSD128:

 
Chord Mojo- 750 Hz Square Wave - DSD128:

 

DSD Playback - Pre and Post Ringing Characteristic

iFi micro iDSD Black-Label - Ultra-wide (Bit Perfect) - 750 Hz Square Wave - DSD128:

 
iFi micro iDSD Black-Label - Extended (Minimum Phase) - 750 Hz Square Wave - DSD128:

 
iFi micro iDSD Black-Label - Standard (Standard)- 750 Hz Square Wave - DSD128:

 
Chord Mojo- 750 Hz Square Wave - DSD128:

 
 
While the PCM filters significantly affect the pre and post ringing of the Square wave, the DSD filters affect more of the output level. This is an important note to be taken when comparing the DSD analog filters using an external amplifier, as the output level is different at different filter setting. Chord Mojo Square wave output looks slightly better on DSD playback in comparison to the PCM playback, with less pre and post ringing.
 


Volume Channel Imbalance
One most important aspect for me from the analog section is the channel balance. No matter how good the sound quality is, if the left and right channels are severely imbalance, all are practically useless. The following measurement is the comparison of the level of channel imbalance of the headphone output of my iFi micro iDSD and the review unit of iFi micro iDSD Black-Label. Power mode was set to Normal on both.


 

 
 
The review unit of iFi micro iDSD Black-Label has very good balance between left and right channel. Mostly less than 0.5 dB across the range, only peaking at around 0.66 dB on a certain range. While on my iFi micro iDSD, I need to switch and tap the glitchy iEMatch switch a few times to get the Right channel sounds balance with the Left channel. Even after getting the right channel sounds right, the channel imbalance on my iFi micro iDSD is still not very good. I hope all iFi micro iDSD Black-Label will have similar performance as the review unit I tested.
 
 

Maximum Volume Setting
Another note for the volume control is the safe maximum volume setting at different Power mode. On Normal and Turbo power mode, 0 dBFS signals (maximum level in the digital format) will clip before the volume knob turned to the maximum position. For example, at Turbo mode and iEMatch sets to Off, loud recording may start to clip at volume knob position around 13:00’ o’clock. Modern recordings usually make full use of the available headroom to achieve maximum loudness. That means the loud parts of the recording may be close to 0 dBFS. Therefore it is recommended not to set the volume beyond the clipping point to avoid distortion. Only when the recording is very soft and needs more volume, then it can be considered to use higher volume setting.

Below is the maximum volume position at various power mode settings, before the THD reach 1%. Or in other words, before the 0 dBFS clips. All measurement were done using QuantAsylum QA401 audio analyzer and OWON VDS3102 oscilloscope, monitoring the THD level and the shape of the sine wave at the same time. 600 ohms load was used.


 

The following screenshots are an example of maximum volume observation with THD monitoring, and SNR measurement with ‘A weighting’ applied and different windowing setting. Notice the significant different of SNR value on the two different settings. QA401 has a built-in 20 dB attenuator. When applied, the SNR measurement has to be compensated as it will cause lower reading of SNR. In my setup, the compensation is measured around 3.7 dB higher. The ‘A weighting’ will also improve SNR reading by around 3 dB. Lastly, the different windowing will also cause different SNR reading. Therefore in many cases, we cannot simply compare SNR value from different measurement setup. SNR measurement is not as simple as voltage measurement. In this case, for example, SNR reading from 2 different setups can be around 13 dB different.


 

 

Here is a table of maximum output voltage measured at <1% THD of 1kHz tone, at 600 ohms load, and the SNR measurement at maximum voltage (dynamic range).
 
Max HO Vout @ 600Ω (V)​
Max HO DR @ 600Ω (dBA)​
 
L (US)​
M (HS)​
H (Off)​
L (US)​
M (HS)​
H (Off)​
Eco
0.137​
0.583​
2.120​
90.5​
91.2​
92.0​
Normal
0.260​
1.160​
4.900​
90.8​
91.2​
93.5​
Turbo
0.300​
1.480​
9.710​
90.0​
90.3​
93.2​

 
L: Ultra Sensitivity
M: High Sensitivity
H: Off
 
 

Headphone and Line Output SNR
When looking at SNR measurement, I take 2 simple practical approaches:
Headphone output: SNR at intended listening value is expected around 85 dB or better.
Line output: SNR @ 2Vrms is expected to be around 96 dB or better, and around 90 dB or better @ 1Vrms if the line output is variable.

For headphone output, the threshold of our human hearing sensitivity on hiss noise is around 85 dB SNR. Meaning, when the hissing noise is 85 dB lower than the music signal, we generally won’t be able to hear the noise, and the headphone output can be considered quiet when there is no music is playing, no audible hiss noise on the IEMs or headphones. This is more relevant with sensitive IEMs. My standard listening level on general sensitive IEMs, like my 1964 Ears V3, is around 50 mV (or even less). Therefore I expect the SNR at 50 mV is to be around 85 dB or better. SNR between 80 dB to 85 dB is practically still pretty quiet and acceptable. Most probably only a very mild audible hiss noise can be heard in a quiet environment. Less than 80 dB, hiss noise will start to be more audible and some people that sensitive to hiss noise might start to complain. But please take note, 50 mV is my standard measurement for sensitive IEMs. Most general IEMs are not very sensitive, therefore even 75 dB to 80 dB SNR at 50 mV can still be considered quiet for many IEMs. So, the rule of thumb, 80 dB SNR or greater is very good, and 85 dB or greater is excellent.

For normal headphones, my standard SNR measurement is at around 250 mV, with the same 80 dB and 85 dB target SNR for very good and excellent category.

As for line out, I expect higher SNR because it is measured at a higher voltage, 1V and 2V. And when we look at Redbook CD dynamic range, which is 96 dB, it can be a practical approach for line output SNR performance to be able to meet Redbook CD maximum dynamic range.

Somehow my SNR measurement result is significantly lower than iFi specification for the micro iDSD Black-Label. The significant differences are most probably due to the different quality of the measurement equipment. Practically, from my short experience with the iFi micro iDSD Black-Label, I didn’t have any issue with noise, both on headphone output and line output. With the right setting, the headphone output is practically quiet even on my most sensitive IEM.
 
 
50mV HO SNR @ 33Ω (dBA)​
250mV HO SNR @ 33Ω (dBA)​
1V HO SNR @ 600Ω (dBA)​
 
L (US)​
M (HS)​
H (Off)​
L (US)​
M (HS)​
H (Off)​
L (US)​
M (HS)​
H (Off)​
iDSD BL - Eco
87.3​
83.1​
74.6​
-​
90.0​
86.8​
-​
-​
90.0​
iDSD BL - Normal
87.0​
82.6​
73.8​
90.6​
89.9​
86.1​
-​
90.6​
89.8​
iDSD BL - Turbo
83.0​
74.8​
63.8​
89.8​
86.6​
77.6​
-​
90.4​
86.5​
Chord Mojo
82.9​
88.8​
89.3​


Line Output Noise Floor: 105.1 dBV

 
 
Line Output SNR, THD, and THD+SNR at 1V (Preamp setting): 88.3 dBA
Line Output SNR, THD, and THD+SNR at 2V (Direct setting): 89.4 dBA

 

RMAA measurement of Line Output (Standard - Direct setting):
 
Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB
+0.01, -0.01​
Excellent​
Noise level, dB (A)
-96.6​
Excellent​
Dynamic range, dB (A)
96.6​
Excellent​
THD, %
0.0092​
Very good​
THD + Noise, dB (A)
-78.0​
Average​
IMD + Noise, %
0.011​
Very good​
Stereo crosstalk, dB
-88.4​
Excellent​
IMD at 10 kHz, %
0.011​
Very good​
General performance
 ​
Very good


 
You can see that there are discrepancies between QA401 measurement and RMAA measurement using HRT LineStreamer+. This is just to show that we should not take all measurement result as absolute. Read it with a grain of salt.
 
 

Measured Headphone Output Impedance
The headphone output impedance was done comparing the peak output voltage between no load and 33 ohms load. The output impedance varies with different iEMatch switch position.

IEMatch Off: 0.34 ohms
IEMatch High Sensitivity: 4.1 ohms
IEMatch Ultra Sensitivity: 0.95 ohms
 


Headphone Amplifier Output Power
Practical observation of the power mode setting:
Eco and Normal mode have pretty close THD and SNR performance and are recommended for most IEMs and headphones.
Turbo mode generally has slightly higher noise and THD, and should only be used when the extra higher power is required. Otherwise, it is recommended to stay on Eco and Normal power mode. Working temperature at Turbo mode can be quite high, can reach up to around 51.5 degree Celsius during my test.


 

The maximum output power depends on the power mode settings and can be calculated based on the maximum output current and voltage.

Headphone Output Maximum Current Output at 15 ohms load:
Turbo mode - iEMatch Off: 306 mA  4.59V
Normal mode - iEMatch Off: 265 mA  3.97V
Eco mode - iEMatch Off: 139 mA  2.09V

Headphone Output Maximum Voltage Output at 600 ohms load:
Turbo mode - iEMatch Off: 9.71 V
Normal mode - iEMatch Off: 4.90 V
Eco mode - iEMatch Off: 2.12 V

Calculated Maximum Output Power at 600 ohms load:
Turbo mode - iEMatch Off: 157.1 mW
Normal mode - iEMatch Off: 40.2 mW
Eco mode - iEMatch Off: 7.5 mW

Calculated Maximum Output Power at 32 ohms load:
Turbo mode - iEMatch Off: 2946 mW
Normal mode - iEMatch Off: 750 mW
Eco mode - iEMatch Off: 66 mW


To observe the different level of gain between various setting, I set the power mode to Eco and the iEMatch switch set to Ultra Sensitivity, headphone output volume set to 10 mV. Then I set iEMatch switch and power mode to a different setting combination and measured the voltage output. Volume setting was not changed and was kept at the initial position. Here is the result of the measured output voltage:

 
HO Gain @ 600Ω (mV)​
 
L (US)​
M (HS)​
H (Off)​
Eco
10.0​
42.6​
157.0​
Normal
29.5​
125.0​
465.0​
Turbo
137.0​
582.0​
2,130.0​

 
 
 
XBass and 3D Matrix Plus
The XBass works very well with HD6xx. When testing HD6xx my preference is to use the XBass most of the time. It gives a natural bass boost that is just nice, not too much, and doesn't sound artificial. Midrange stays clear with XBass, no bass bleed to midrange. iDSD BL seems to be an excellent match for HD6xx.

The following is the RMAA measurement of the headphone output, comparing without and with XBass and 3D Matrix Plus.
 
Test
iFi micro iDSD BL Nor HO 600ohms
iFi micro iDSD BL Nor HO 600ohms XBass
iFi micro iDSD BL Nor HO 600ohms 3D
iFi micro iDSD BL Nor HO 600ohms XBass & 3D
Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB:
+0.01, -0.03​
+6.02, -0.56​
+0.06, +0.00​
+5.90, -0.67​
Noise level, dB (A):
-78.4​
-84.6​
-81.7​
-83.3​
Dynamic range, dB (A):
78.0​
84.2​
81.4​
83.1​
THD, %:
0.0049​
0.0045​
0.0049​
0.0035​
IMD + Noise, %:
0.031​
0.022​
0.031​
0.018​
Stereo crosstalk, dB:
-82.7​
-89.7​
-18.7​
-20.9​
 
 


 
 
A few interesting things to observe is the THD level is pretty much similar with and without the XBass and 3D Matrix Plus. iFi managed to enhance the bass and spatial perception without adding harmonic distortion, which is pretty impressive. As expected, stereo crosstalk is greatly affected when 3D Matrix Plus is activated.
 


Battery life and charging time.
I didn’t have enough time to do an extensive observation of the battery life. Managed only to do a single continuous playback of Pink Noise at 250 mV at 16 ohms, at Normal power setting, and the battery last to almost 8 hours. This is pretty much like driving headphone continuously at Normal power mode. At Eco power mode the battery is expected to last longer.

Below is the charging curve of iFi micro iDSD Black-Label from battery level at empty state to 100%. It requires around 6:16’ hours to fully charge the battery.
 

 

 

One interesting question would be if there is any difference in sound quality between battery powered and USB powered mode. Unfortunately, I didn’t have enough time to properly observe the difference. I only managed to do a short test, and I couldn’t hear the difference between battery powered and USB powered mode.
 
 
 
LED Indicator
Lastly is the LED indicator. I really have no idea why a simple device such as micro iCan has 3 LED indicators, and such a complex device like the micro iDSD Black-Label has only 1 LED indicator.
From the manual:
 
Power ON - LED Color:
Magenta: DSD512 22.5/24.5MHz
Blue: DSD256 11.2/12.2MHz
Cyan: DSD128/DSD64 2.8/3.1/5.6/6.2MHz
White: DXD705/768kHz
Yellow: 176/192kHz DXD352/384kHz
Green: 44/48/88/96kHz
Green(Flashing): Awaiting USB Connection
Red: Battery Low
None: Battery Empty
 
Power OFF - LED Color:
Blue*: Charging (OFF when fully-charged)
 
Are the ifi micro iDSD Black-Label users expected to memorize all of those color codes? I’m sorry to say that in my opinion that is the most ridiculously complicated LED indicator I’ve ever seen. I couldn’t find any pattern to memorize them easily. There is no indicator for the current battery level before the capacity reached to the low level. I have no idea if my WASAPI drive works since all the common PCM rates grouped into one color. Basically, it is not a user-friendly indicator.
I would suggest for a complex and feature rich device such as micro iDSD Black-Label to use at least 3 LED indicators, based on easy to remember RGB pattern as the following:
 

 
LED 1: Power indicator
Off: When the LED 1 is off when the system is switched ON, it indicates battery flat or protection circuit is activated and shutting down the system temporarily.
Red blinking: Battery powered, Battery Low, battery level <10%
Red: Battery powered, battery level 10% - <40%
Yellow: Battery powered, battery level 40% - <70%
Green: Battery powered, battery level 70% - 100%
Blue: USB powered or fully charged
Blue blinking: Battery charging in progress

LED 2: PCM sampling rate or DSD format
Off: No digital signal is present, analog input is selected
Red: 44.1 kHz PCM (Redbook)
Green: 48 kHz PCM
Blue: DSD

LED 3: PCM and DSD multiplier
Off: 1x
Red: 2x
Green: 4x
Blue: 8x
White: 16x

If the 1st power LED spaced a bit further from the 2nd and 3rd LEDs for easy identification, it would be easier to identify the 1st LED from any orientation. I hope iFi would use a more user-friendly, and useful LED indicator in their next version of micro iDSD.




iFi micro iDSD Black-Label is probably the most unique and feature rich DAC+Amp combo in its class. The Black-Label version is a proof of iFi main priority in their design philosophy, which is sound quality. The Black-Label version has similar features to the older version of micro iDSD, and all the effort and improvement is only to achieve one goal, better sound quality. And I think iFi has achieved it. Kudos to iFi!
 
 

 

 

 

 
 



Equipment used in this review:

Headphones:
Audio-Technica ATH-R70x
Audio-Technica ATH-MSR7
Beyerdynamic T1
HiFiMan HE-6
Massdrop HD6xx
Sennheiser HD800
Philips Fidelio X1
STAX SR-L300 + SRM-252S
 
In-Ear Monitors:
1964 Audio V3 (universal)
AK T8iE Mk2
Brainwavz B200
DUNU DN-2000
 
DAC and Amplifiers:
Chord Mojo
iFi micro iDSD
iFi micro iCan
Audio-Technica AT-HA22Tube
 
Measurement Equipment:
QuantAsylum QA401 - 24-bit Audio Analyzer
Owon VDS3102 - 100 MHz Digital Storage Oscilloscope
Brymen BM829s - Digital Multimeter
HRT LineStreamer+ - Analog to Digital Converter
ZKE EBD-USB+ - USB Power Meter
 
Computer & Player:
DIY Desktop PC: Gigabyte GA-H77-D3H-MVP motherboard, Intel i7-3770, 16 GB RAM, Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit SP1.
foobar2000 v1.3.12



Some recordings used in this review:
 


 
Very useful post, lots of information! 

Thank you once again, @earfonia for taking the time and doing all those tests! 
beerchug.gif

 
Apr 24, 2017 at 9:50 AM Post #28 of 1,056
Looking for opinions- this or the Mojo?

 
Read the review above. It contains possibly the most thorough and complete answer to that question that anyone has ever given. If you know what you are looking for and what you find important in a DAC/amp, the review should be sufficient to decide which to get.
 
Personally, I decided to get a Black Label because it is the most all-in-one audio product I've ever seen and seems to have no real shortcomings. But, that's me.
 
Apr 24, 2017 at 9:53 AM Post #29 of 1,056
Read the review above. It contains possibly the most thorough and complete answer to that question that anyone has ever given. If you know what you are looking for and what you find important in a DAC/amp, the review should be sufficient to decide which to get.

Personally, I decided to get a Black Label because it is the most all-in-one audio product I've ever seen and seems to have no real shortcomings. But, that's me.
I'm looking for a portable dac/amp which will give me the closest audio experience to a desktop solution eg Oppo ha-1. I've tried a variety of self contained daps, including the zx2 and qp1r, but they don't quite achieve this level of experience.
 
Apr 24, 2017 at 12:43 PM Post #30 of 1,056
I'm looking for a portable dac/amp which will give me the closest audio experience to a desktop solution eg Oppo ha-1. I've tried a variety of self contained daps, including the zx2 and qp1r, but they don't quite achieve this level of experience.

 
I prefer iDSD BL over HA-1 from experience. HA1 was okay but there was too little bite both ends, the textures were not vivid enough and the dynamics were not that great. The conditions I heard HA-1 in were not perfect, but iDSD BL sounded considerably more vivid and dynamic when compared head-to-head. 
 
I also prefer iDSD BL over Mojo in general, I'm not sure why, but it sounds more real-like with ie800 to my ears. 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top