Well, redbacks don't have to have the red on their back. I think the distinguishing feature is the hourglass shaped red area which is underneath and then there is usually red going round to their upper body, but that's not always the case.
EDIT - Whoh, boy... didn't see those extra pictures, fordgtlover... that's nightmare material right there.
And I just read the article linked on the first page:
Quote:
Africa's Brown Button spider [the one eating the snake] is related to Australia's Redback spider and America's Black Widow spider. All three have distinctive red markings on their bodies and are similar in shape.
Originally Posted by silencewithin /img/forum/go_quote.gif That ain't a redback.
I saw this in the news a few weeks back. Apparently it ended up in some museum according to that article. I'm not sure where that spider is from (Africa? maybe South Africa iirc) but it isn't Australia.
You know redbacks have the red on their back!
plus it doesn't look like a redback, different shaped abdomen.
Sorry man, but that simply isn't true. First, a red back won't always even have a red marking of any sort (although most do). If a marking is present, it can range in hue quite dramatically from bright red to orange. Second, most will have a red marking on the underside of the abdomen (usually an hourglass shape) and/or a red marking on the back.
In relation to your comment about the different abdomen - they range significantly in size and shape. The male looks so different from the female (which is the one people seem more likely to instantly recognise) that it is rarely recognised as a red back.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.