IEM's on stage. Why?
Mar 6, 2009 at 6:27 PM Post #16 of 20
Quote:

Originally Posted by jsmithepa /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Name Stevie's IEM.

StevieIEM.jpg




stevie uses future sonics customs.
 
Mar 6, 2009 at 6:38 PM Post #17 of 20
Quote:

Originally Posted by Keithpgdrb /img/forum/go_quote.gif
one of the hardest things to do is set stage monitors the way everyone likes them. the vocalist needs to hear himself, as well as a chordal instrument to keep him in tune, and some drums for time. guitar needs different things, as does the drummer. IEM's allow every member of the band to get as much or as little of the monitor cue as they need. eliminates the need for on stage monitors, which are large, and loud, and often irritating. AND, it helps remedy a lot of feedback problems in the system. lets see, what else... oh yeah, saves your hearing, because you can set your own level. um.... lots more advantages. there are a few drawbacks depending on the system, but they are usually outweighed by the benefits. hope thats a little helpful.


You were very helpful Keithpgdrb. Thanks.
L3000.gif
 
Mar 6, 2009 at 7:06 PM Post #18 of 20
as others have said, in most IEM mixes, the artist is listening to a full mix of the band, with themselves on top. depending on the act, they'll also have a click track (metronome) and count-offs. a lot of times, on a larger stage, an artist will have communications fed into their in-ears too, and have small mics on themselves, or mics in an inconspicuous location on stage, so they can talk to each other between songs.

i have a handful of tapes made from in-ear mixes on a hard drive somewhere, if anyone's interested, i could upload a couple mp3s to give an idea what it's like listening to IEMs on stage.
 
Mar 6, 2009 at 7:21 PM Post #19 of 20
just to throw in one more interesting thing. As a person who uses the IEM on stage, I have a love/hate relationship for one reason. when the IEM is in your ear, your own voice or instrument resonates loudly. you can see what this is like by saying "hello hello hello", then doing the same with your fingers in your ears. your voice turns into a muffled mess. the only two ways to counteract this is 1. to set up your IEM so that your seal is not very good. you can still get some decent sound for what you need. the second way is to turn up the IEM so that it overpowers your own voice resonating in your head. In my opinion, the latter is bad. I want to be able to hear when I'm 40.

Its interesting.. the mix you want when listening to music for pleasure on an IEM is completely different then using it as a monitor. Remember, this is not the case for lets say a guitar, bass, or drummer. they are not making their sounds with their bodies, thus dont have the same issues. I have always found monitor mixes unsatisfying. they are purely utilitarian. But... its really a better option then a large speaker blowing your brains out on stage.
 
Mar 6, 2009 at 9:27 PM Post #20 of 20
I too have a love hate relationship with IEM's.

If your not careful you can feel isolated from the crowd. You gotta put up crowd mics and use them.

You can also have a hard time communicating with the other musicians. The more you play with the band the less you have to actually talk but can gesture.

My guitar amp sounds completely different miced and put in an IEM then it does when it's 5 feet behind me and I'm hearing the sound bounce around the stage. I always think I need more gain.

And the most annoying thing is trying to find an IEM I really like the sound off. That's why I prefer dynamics like Future Sonics. The emphasized bass means I can listen at a much lower volume and not turn it up constantly to get the sound I need.

A stage is generally a boomy place because your often near sub woofers when your inside. Outside it's exactly the opposite. The bass is gone. Especially if the wind is blowing. Anyway, boomy IEM's give you a more visceral feeling to the music which I much prefer. And it's not just the sound of the IEM, but the transmitter/receiver too. My Sennheiser set transmits FM which changes the tonal quality. There can also be malfunctions and frequency problems with drop outs and squeltch that are a big hastle. In larger cities you find yourself changing frequencies each gig to find some clear ones. Hassle.


The good usually outweighs the bad however.

You won't go def! Until now Tinnitus/hearing loss was just a fact of life for musicians. Now you have choice. THIS IS HUGE!! There's been many gigs where I was soooo glad I was using IEM's and didn't have to struggle through the HORRIBLE LOUD sound on stage. I took out my IEM's after the gig and I can hear perfect. No ringing, no dulling.

Most stages during rock shows usually hit 104-106 db and stay there. Or way worse in some cases. Your ears ring. Most people have no idea what is sounds like on stage for a band. It's very unusual. You can't hear crap half the time. The clugs PA and monitors are a joke half the time. Most sound guys are pretty bad. Even when this is not the case a lot of rooms/stages just sound really bad and washy with all that sound bouncing around. Sometimes you get a slap back delay off the back wall thats REALLY distracting. All of this is out of your control most of the time.

IEM's are not. You put in exactly what you want to hear and at what level.

You can hear EVERYTHING that's going on on stage. You vocal confidence get WAY better. You sing and play completely different cause you can hear every little note.

And sometimes, with a good mix, and good IEM's you get epiphonic kind of thing where you can't believe how perfect it sounds and you wish you could give a set to everybody in the audience cause it sounds way better to you then it does to anybody else listening. Those nights you wear a perma-grin all night and look like a idiot on stage. Then you start spending money and time on your IEM rig and posting here.

smile.gif



Right Joe?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top