1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

    Dismiss Notice

IEM Score List R25

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
  1. Virtu Fortuna
    IEM Score List R25.jpg
    Click here for reaching out the original file. Select EN tab for English.

    Disclaimer: If you have not read the reviews of the IEMs in this table, the scores have no meaning. The only purpose of the score table is that it can give a rough idea. It does not make you understand how an IEM sounds. It is a subjective table. Therefore, please do not solely use this table for your purchasing decisions.

    * Custom IEMs are marked with italic font.

    * The scores can be updated and corrected if necessary.
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2019
    ValSilva, hgpardo, viatraco and 21 others like this.
  2. Hifi2jungle
    Would mind adding the Oriolus? I personally think, it is above Layla 2. 
  3. Virtu Fortuna
    I didn't get a chance to listen to it I'm afraid. My friend said it competes with K10 so I think your comment meets with his.
  4. Virtu Fortuna
    Images resized to be easier to see
  5. Virtu Fortuna
    Oriolus V2 and UM Martian added.
  6. Virtu Fortuna
    Updated with new and more accurate scores.
  7. eargasam
    Got a chance to demo the kse1500 yet ?
  8. Virtu Fortuna
    No I'm afraid
  9. flinkenick
    KSE1500 has a very different type of presentation than regular multi BA's that comes with certain pros and cons, you can recognize that typical electrostat sound like the Stax have. It is highly accurate, with great resolution and especially transparency. But the midrange lacks warmth and feels dry compared to BA's, partially since the mid-bass is somewhat attenuated and impact is mostly sub-bass. The treble has that ethereal feel, a little bit thin but very quick. The soundstage is wide, but feels especially so since it is not very tall. So more of a flat/wide. However, these were just brief impressions at Canjam :wink:
  10. Virtu Fortuna
    Thanks for your impressions mate. I'm sure they have a distinctive sound based on the technology. 
    Soundstage is not a surprise then, given that it lacks mid-bass. That usually gives a more open and roomy sound. 
    It would be very very fortunate if I ever get a chance to experience them. I can only hope so :)
    flinkenick likes this.
  11. fzman Contributor
    So, here is a question for you folks. I am mean no offense by this, but really am interested in seeing how people respond to this...Given a choice between (yes, you have to pick only one of them-no cheating!):
    1. A recording of, e.g., five sax players each of which is very precisely positioned in space in all three dimensions, but where they sound more like kazoos, and you can;t really tell them apart sonically
    2. The same recording where you can clearly hear that it is 2 altos, 2 tenors, and a baritone sax, and you can clearly hear the different tone of the specific insturments being played, and the technique of the musicians
    which would you prefer?
    This all in reference to the 1500 vs. other iems.  
  12. flinkenick
    I'm missing what part the reference is to the 1500 vs other iems?
  13. Virtu Fortuna
    The config of Oriolus is corrected, colors added to prices in addition.
  14. fzman Contributor
    I guess I did not make it even remotely clear-my bad!
    Most recordings are multi-mono, and any 'soundstage' is really just the result of using pan-pots or the digital equvalent.  Most recordings are not true stereo, and do not really have a soundstage or imaging.  Live concerts don't either, imho.  What concerts and good multi-mono records can have, is natural, authentic timbre, and proper phase coherence-that is, all of the fundamentals and harmonics are lined up properly in time.  (saxes, rather than kazoos).  I think the 1500s do this very well, (So do other single-driver iems like the original Kaede and the Dita, just to name 2.) Lots of multi-B.A. iems sound nice, or pretty, or exciting, but they are more like fun-house mirrors than an open window.  That's OK, and people should seek their bliss, and I am not suggesting otherwise.  For me, my evaluation style is to kind of observe myself observing the sound, and see how I am reacting.  "Gee, this sounds good" is nice, but something like "wow, Clapton almost always plays a Les Paul, wonder why he chose a Gibson SG for this track" is much better.  the gear got out of the way and left me more in touch with the music.  
    Proably just made it even less clear, but irrespectiveof the connection to the 1500s or anything else, how would you answer my 1 vs. 2 question from my earlier post?
  15. flinkenick
    Think this refers to tonal accuracy and transparency? From my brief experience with electrostats I did get the feeling that they are way more transparent than multi BA's, although BA's felt slightly more natural sounding to me (rather than accurate) due to the midrange warmth. But this is also something I think you need to get used to, the difference in sound. Electrostats just sound so different than what I'm used to, that I'd need some time getting accustomed to it. But after that, it's very well possible I would say that sound is more natural, since it is tonally more accurate. I can't judge on that based on my very limited experience with them.
    As for your question, it's really hard man :wink: I think presentation and tonality both contribute so much to the experience that it's hard to disentangle. I guess tonality would be more important, even if everything was lumped together so to speak.
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Share This Page