Quote:
Originally Posted by jjcha /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Okay it's been more than three weeks and I don't know. I listen to it, and there's a lot to like about the sound. It's a lot more relaxed than the 010 or K 1000. It has nice presence, images well, has good texture. It's got nice air. Bass is okay, but I'm not particularly impressed -- it's just not that defined or tight. Still, it sounds nice, but when I listen to the HE90, I often find myself wanting to switch to the 010 or the K 1000 (or HP1, if I got that gimble fixed dammit). It doesn't happen in reverse.
I find the HE90 to be too euphonic - it's very melodic, but it gets in the way of the music. I find the 010 brings me closer to the sound. The 010 is far leaner and strips away everything away from the sound, leaving only a raw core. The HE90 is far gentler and softer. I can see how many may prefer the HE90, but I'm just used to the raw purity of the 010.
Any thoughts guys? Maybe it's just my sound preferences. Right now I'm running the stock Aristaeus configuration sourced by the m902 - I imagine neither is particularly geared towards bringing the HE90 to my sound.
It's not like I don't like the HE90. I find it's pretty good in most areas. Just not superlative in any area. For me it's a bit of a jack of all trades, with a very romanticized overlay to it. Given I prefer flawed cans with strong character, and warm and musical ain't my sound... I wonder if a properly driven Omega 2 isn't better for texture. I guess I'm just wondering if this ain't for me...
Best,
-Jason
|
Hey Jason!
It's been a while since last time I entered Head-Fi and I find such an interesting post of yours. It exactly states my feelings about the HE90. On my 3rd week with them I was feeling exactly the same. Seriously, I could have written myself your post with your exact words a while ago. Spooky!
Specially that part about finding yourself wanting to switch to another phones but not that much the other way around. I was doing A/B tests (especially against the Omega1) and it always was easy for me to go from HE90 to Omega1 than to Omega1 to HE90. Sometimes I was doing sessions of 5 mins HE90, 40 min O1, 10 min HE90, 45 min O1, 20 min HE90, 55 min O1, etc etc.
I'm not saying here that the O1 is better than the HE90 (actually the O1s were a bit lean from the HEV90, although this didn't happen from a T1, but then again the T1 couldn't bring the detail the HEV90 was giving). It's just that I felt them more engaging. Still, the HE90 is a fantastic headphone anyway.
I do not think a change on the source is going to make a difference on your impressions. Actually a better source/setup should give even greater advantage to the Qualias as they are more unforgiving. Of course the HE90 will sound better with a better source, but an HE90 sounds pretty great from almost everything while 010s or K1000s can sound pretty crappy from some sources.
I'd advice you to give it some more time, just in case. I remember I wasn't impressed with the R10s on my first weeks and things did improve a lot, being now one of my usual headphones in rotation. Still, I must say that although they grew a lot on me, they never became my favorite headphones either and I have the funny feeling that this might happen to you as well. But it is worth to try it anyway.
Good luck!