wildeone
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2004
- Posts
- 282
- Likes
- 0
Quote:
I disagree with lindrone -- I think the E3's bass is on par with the Etys, not superior. However, the sound signature is way different. Then again, I just wasn't blown away by the E3's at all. I chose to get the E2's for exercise for their hardiness and also good old thumping bass. (Don't miss the detail at all whilst sweating.) In my mind there is no doubt that the ER-4's are a step up from the E3's. Some people, though, just find them too sterile. In which case there's the E5's....
As for the behind your ear design -- no, the Etys are hang down the front. The work-arounds are absurd looking, so if you like them going down your back, I'd step up to the E5's instead.
Originally posted by gorman Let's say I'm satisfied with E3's bass. Would I be downgrading on that regard with Etys? Because if Etys bass is similar to E3s, I might opt for Etys for the added detail. Another dumb question: are Etys worn behind the ears as Shure? I find that very handy. |
I disagree with lindrone -- I think the E3's bass is on par with the Etys, not superior. However, the sound signature is way different. Then again, I just wasn't blown away by the E3's at all. I chose to get the E2's for exercise for their hardiness and also good old thumping bass. (Don't miss the detail at all whilst sweating.) In my mind there is no doubt that the ER-4's are a step up from the E3's. Some people, though, just find them too sterile. In which case there's the E5's....
As for the behind your ear design -- no, the Etys are hang down the front. The work-arounds are absurd looking, so if you like them going down your back, I'd step up to the E5's instead.