Ckaz
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2009
- Posts
- 216
- Likes
- 13
So, I am currently in the market for some speakers.
Right now, I have the Logitech X-540's, and an Auzentech Forte sound card. Based on my current speakers, you might not guess it, but I am, in fact, in audiophile in the making.
I bought those speakers a while back because they were cheap, and the surround sound seemed cool. The surround sound still is cool, but as I find myself turning in into more and more of an audiophile, the SQ is not coming close to cutting it. Time for an upgrade.
At first, I was trying to find a good 5.1 speaker system. What I have recently learned is that 5.1, and "good", are two words that don't seem to go together in the speaker world. So, regretfully, I set out to look for a good pair of 2.1's.
Now, I would love a home audio setup, but I simply can't afford a reciever AND a pair of good quality speakers, let alone a sub to go along with it. So, I set out to find a good pair of speakers, that didn't require a reciever, but still delivered amazing sound quality.
As for my music tastes, I listen to hip hop of all kinds, techno/trance/hardstyle/ and black/celtic folk metal. I am a huge bass head (hence my inclination toward a 5.1 setup) but I need my bass to be tight and fast (hence my decision not to go with the Z-5500's). This means that I need a subwoofer in my setup. I might be able to handle the transition from 5 to 2 speakers, but I definatley need a sub. I am prepared to get a set of 2.0 speakers, as long as I can find a subwoofer to go with it, and this usually ends up being extremely expensive.
So, I auditioned the M-Audio speakers AV-40's, and though the SQ was decent, it didn't blow me away. They didn't seem very loud either, and of course, there was no sub. After the M-Audio's, I have been extremely hard pressed to find another pair of speakers that didn't require a reciever/amp to power them. The closest I have come are the Audioengine A5's. I have heard that the SQ is quite incredible for self-powered speakers, but again, THERE IS NO SUB!!!!
As I said earlier, I am prepared to buy an extra sub, but it usually gets very expensive, and I need a sub that will compliment whichever speakers I end up going with, while still providing substantial power (I need 150W MINIMUM out of my sub). Audioengine offers their own subwoofer, but it is too expesnive. So, to sum up, my subwoofer dilemma goes as such: the sub needs to be relativley cheap, but it needs to provide lots of power (remember, I love my bass, but it also needs to be tight and controlled), and I need to know it is compatible and compliments the sound of whichever speakers I decide to go with.
I have been looking lots at Swans speakers, but they are extremely hard to find. theaudioinsider.com said they might be getting the M50's in by spring, but the M60's (a 5.1 audio system from Swans) aren't available anywhere. I have heard great things about the M200's, but they are pretty old. Will they be able to compete with all of th newer offerrings? Which subwoofer would you recommend for me to pair with the M200's.
K, I know this is a lot to take in, so I will leave it to you. I realllllllllyyyyyy want a 5.1 setup, but if one that fits my parameters simply can't be found, then so be it. A 2.0 setup with a seperate sub seems best so that I can get lots of power out of my sub, and get good SQ out of my speakers. With a 2.1, the SQ is usually good, but the sub usually lacks power. I have a $600 maximum budget on this one. Also, they need to be able to run from an Auzentech Forte sound card.
So, where should I start? What would you recommend?
Right now, I have the Logitech X-540's, and an Auzentech Forte sound card. Based on my current speakers, you might not guess it, but I am, in fact, in audiophile in the making.
I bought those speakers a while back because they were cheap, and the surround sound seemed cool. The surround sound still is cool, but as I find myself turning in into more and more of an audiophile, the SQ is not coming close to cutting it. Time for an upgrade.
At first, I was trying to find a good 5.1 speaker system. What I have recently learned is that 5.1, and "good", are two words that don't seem to go together in the speaker world. So, regretfully, I set out to look for a good pair of 2.1's.
Now, I would love a home audio setup, but I simply can't afford a reciever AND a pair of good quality speakers, let alone a sub to go along with it. So, I set out to find a good pair of speakers, that didn't require a reciever, but still delivered amazing sound quality.
As for my music tastes, I listen to hip hop of all kinds, techno/trance/hardstyle/ and black/celtic folk metal. I am a huge bass head (hence my inclination toward a 5.1 setup) but I need my bass to be tight and fast (hence my decision not to go with the Z-5500's). This means that I need a subwoofer in my setup. I might be able to handle the transition from 5 to 2 speakers, but I definatley need a sub. I am prepared to get a set of 2.0 speakers, as long as I can find a subwoofer to go with it, and this usually ends up being extremely expensive.
So, I auditioned the M-Audio speakers AV-40's, and though the SQ was decent, it didn't blow me away. They didn't seem very loud either, and of course, there was no sub. After the M-Audio's, I have been extremely hard pressed to find another pair of speakers that didn't require a reciever/amp to power them. The closest I have come are the Audioengine A5's. I have heard that the SQ is quite incredible for self-powered speakers, but again, THERE IS NO SUB!!!!
As I said earlier, I am prepared to buy an extra sub, but it usually gets very expensive, and I need a sub that will compliment whichever speakers I end up going with, while still providing substantial power (I need 150W MINIMUM out of my sub). Audioengine offers their own subwoofer, but it is too expesnive. So, to sum up, my subwoofer dilemma goes as such: the sub needs to be relativley cheap, but it needs to provide lots of power (remember, I love my bass, but it also needs to be tight and controlled), and I need to know it is compatible and compliments the sound of whichever speakers I decide to go with.
I have been looking lots at Swans speakers, but they are extremely hard to find. theaudioinsider.com said they might be getting the M50's in by spring, but the M60's (a 5.1 audio system from Swans) aren't available anywhere. I have heard great things about the M200's, but they are pretty old. Will they be able to compete with all of th newer offerrings? Which subwoofer would you recommend for me to pair with the M200's.
K, I know this is a lot to take in, so I will leave it to you. I realllllllllyyyyyy want a 5.1 setup, but if one that fits my parameters simply can't be found, then so be it. A 2.0 setup with a seperate sub seems best so that I can get lots of power out of my sub, and get good SQ out of my speakers. With a 2.1, the SQ is usually good, but the sub usually lacks power. I have a $600 maximum budget on this one. Also, they need to be able to run from an Auzentech Forte sound card.
So, where should I start? What would you recommend?