Dyoel182
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2006
- Posts
- 171
- Likes
- 10
And the touch is supposed to be a slight step below the classic and nano in terms of sq so I really need to hear the new zune 80.
Originally Posted by Dyoel182 /img/forum/go_quote.gif And the touch is supposed to be a slight step below the classic and nano in terms of sq so I really need to hear the new zune 80. |
Originally Posted by Dyoel182 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Thats contrary to what any reviews about the line out will tell you though. |
Originally Posted by vranswer /img/forum/go_quote.gif Just didn't really care for the mid-bass smushiness slant of the sound sig. Plus, with my E500s I couldn't control volume - player would go from too quiet to way too loud in one step, so could never get enjoyable listening experience. And Zune is MAMMOTH, ENORMOUS, HUGE. Had to get a construction permit to clip it to my belt. By contrast, my new iPod Touch is sleek and barely noticeable, weighing just over four ounces. It has clean sound sig, very neutral. Might be a little lean using bass-challenged 'phones like Etys or something, but with my E5s and E500s the Touch is beautiful. Great soundstage, solid lush bass, clean highs. Glad you're enjoying the Zune, it's still a solid competitor for iPod. I guess just not my cup of tea. |
Originally Posted by Amblin /img/forum/go_quote.gif Yes, I wish someone here at H-Fi would do a detailed comparison between the Zune 30 and 80's sound quality. |
Originally Posted by Penchum /img/forum/go_quote.gif I have both the 30 & 80 and tested using the same files, same tube amp and headphones. LDII++ and Senn 580s. The 80 does have better sound quality. The 30 only sounds ok if you use the EQ. I went back and forth with the multiple tracks, over and over again. I don't think there is an doubt that the 80 has better SQ. Those who like the 30 because they like the enhanced bass of the EQ, should keep them. Those that like a flatter but more detailed spectrum, better sound stage and 3D positioning, should pick up an 80. IMHO, YMMV. |
Originally Posted by stevenjchang /img/forum/go_quote.gif ya, regardless of what looks better on paper, or any kind of technical argument iPods make me happy. other mp3 players do not. i think this has partly to do with my library being totally married to itunes and all the espn/news/hbo podcasts i listen to and sync on a daily basis. anybody else in the same boat? or is it just me? |
Originally Posted by serpico /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm assuming you are talking about the line out from the ipod and not the line out of the Apple Universal Dock. That's why people use a good IC and Amp to power their headphones. The universal dock line out did nothing for me with an amp or without it. |
Originally Posted by uraflit /img/forum/go_quote.gif the line-out dock is coming out from the "charging input" connector... not the headphone out. i hear a huge difference between the lineout and the headphone out... |
Originally Posted by decesaro /img/forum/go_quote.gif Well I like cheap woman, and good beer ...... Who's with me |
Originally Posted by Dyoel182 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm confused. Wouldnt the line out from any dock be exactly the same since its coming off the same bottom plug? |
Originally Posted by Dyoel182 /img/forum/go_quote.gif But those plug into the bottom as well, right? The signal you get from the bottom should be the same on any line out since thats where the signal is. |